1988
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.5.001610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian amplitude functions that are exact solutions to the scalar Helmholtz equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These phasors are expressed in terms of associated Legendre functions and spherical Hankel functions of complex arguments (Couture & Bélanger, 1981). Landesman and Barrett obtained the same solutions using the oblate spheroidal coordinates (Landesman & Barrett, 1988). Such phasors can be viewed as being generated with the complex point-source method, leading to nonphysically realizable beams.…”
Section: Higher-order Nonparaxial Gaussian Beamsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These phasors are expressed in terms of associated Legendre functions and spherical Hankel functions of complex arguments (Couture & Bélanger, 1981). Landesman and Barrett obtained the same solutions using the oblate spheroidal coordinates (Landesman & Barrett, 1988). Such phasors can be viewed as being generated with the complex point-source method, leading to nonphysically realizable beams.…”
Section: Higher-order Nonparaxial Gaussian Beamsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The phasor of the nonparaxial Gaussian beam obtained with the help of the complex sourcepoint method depends on the parameter a, which is the confocal parameter of the oblate spheroidal coordinates (Landesman & Barrett, 1988). In fact, it turns out that the oblate spheroidal coordinates (,,) ξ ηφ are the ones in which it is natural to express the phasor of the nonparaxial Gaussian beam.…”
Section: The Confocal Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-order corrections [11][12][13] have been also suggested, which may provide an approximate solution with minimal numerical errors if a set of parameters is carefully chosen. Nevertheless, the lack of an exact solution for the description of tightly focused beams without any approximation, provided the impetus to further extend a method based on the complex source point (CSP) formalism [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] (Note the misprint in Eq. (3) of [20]; as written, Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same method can be also applied using the CSP formalism (Eq. (22) in [16]) [14,15,18,19,[41][42][43], and the result remains an exact solution of the Helmholtz equation. The effect of having the description of a generalized solution in a complex coordinates system, which may appear at first glance a simple artifice, has a major physical meaning in the description of evanescent waves [44] and the production of finite directional beams [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The oblate spheroidal beams presented here do not present any singularity whenever c = 0. Using the CSPM, 7,8,9,10 it is usually proposed that in the paraxial limit d can take the value of R 0 . From eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%