2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian distribution-based modeling of cutting depth predictions of kerf profiles for ductile materials machined by abrasive waterjet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the spatial distribution of the velocity distribution and particle number, the 3 criterion is adopted, and the scar width of particles in any crosssection of the AWJ beam is assumed to be concentrated in the range of 3  . The scar width is primarily affected by the nozzle structure, standoff distance, system pressure, particle parameter, and mixing ratio [29,30], and is expressed as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Model Of Single-pass Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the spatial distribution of the velocity distribution and particle number, the 3 criterion is adopted, and the scar width of particles in any crosssection of the AWJ beam is assumed to be concentrated in the range of 3  . The scar width is primarily affected by the nozzle structure, standoff distance, system pressure, particle parameter, and mixing ratio [29,30], and is expressed as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Model Of Single-pass Energy Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical expression that is employed is the one proposed by Hashish [43], based on a thorough analysis of the kerf formation and subsequent validation in many different workpiece materials under various process conditions. Although this model was developed more than 30 years ago, it was employed several times during the next years [4,[44][45][46][47][48], either as benchmark model or in a modified way, along with the much older erosion models, such as the ones of Finnie and Bitter, as it can be considered at least as a reference given its credibility and the ability to capture the variations of depth and width of the kerf based on several process parameters.…”
Section: Second Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For four decades, several authors have proposed different types of models for the prediction of the kerf dimensions, especially in the case of slot milling by AWJ. These models are based on analytical or semi-empirical formulas [3][4][5], geometrical [6,7] or kinematics models, regression models, neural networks, energy-based approaches, and models based on etching rate calculation [8], apart from FE or hybrid approaches [9][10][11]. The main differences between the various types of developed models lie in their general predictive ability, their dependence on experimental data in order to derive constant parameters, their computational cost, their flexibility to predict variations from ideal outcome, and their applicability in demanding cases [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%