2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.106730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian process regression based remaining fatigue life prediction for metallic materials under two-step loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such datasets, suitable for comparison of fatigue damage accumulation models, are scarce. The state‐of‐the‐art verification of fatigue damage accumulation models is based on block loading spectra, of which two‐level block loading is the most commonly used 27 . The most extensive suitable dataset published in literature was developed by Manson et al in 1967 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such datasets, suitable for comparison of fatigue damage accumulation models, are scarce. The state‐of‐the‐art verification of fatigue damage accumulation models is based on block loading spectra, of which two‐level block loading is the most commonly used 27 . The most extensive suitable dataset published in literature was developed by Manson et al in 1967 28 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state-of-the-art verification of fatigue damage accumulation models is based on block loading spectra, of which two-level block loading is the most commonly used. 27 The most extensive suitable dataset published in literature was developed by Manson et al in 1967. 28 Their work was also published in the book ASTM STP 415, 29 but the tabular data were only published in the NASA Technical note.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (27) estimates the output values for the regions R lm , thus Equation ( 26) can be written as…”
Section: Application Of Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning techniques are effective tools to improve the speed of predictive models, as shown recently in various fields of science. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Data-driven machine learning methods were employed successfully to predict fatigue life, [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] fatigue crack growth, [32][33][34][35] creep, [36][37][38][39][40] and creepfatigue 41,42 of metallic alloys, but less research has explored the probabilistic modeling of creep and fatigue. Previous work includes [43][44][45] applying a distributed collaborative wavelet neural network regression (DCWNNR), a distributed-coordinated neural network metamodel (DCNNM), and a decomposed collaborative time-variant Kriging surrogate (DCTKS) model approach to make probabilistic assessments of low cycle fatigue (LCF) and creep-fatigue life of turbine disks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This again implicitly shows that the amount of suitable experimental data in the literature is limited. The work of Gan et al [22] inspired Gao et al [23] to further investigate remaining fatigue life prediction under two-step loading, comparing a number of machine learning models to conventional fatigue damage accumulation models. They found that all the machine learning models performed better than the conventional models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%