2023
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-103508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaussian Process Regression for Astronomical Time Series

Abstract: The past two decades have seen a major expansion in the availability, size, and precision of time-domain data sets in astronomy. Owing to their unique combination of flexibility, mathematical simplicity, and comparative robustness, Gaussian processes (GPs) have emerged recently as the solution of choice to model stochastic signals in such data sets. In this review, we provide a brief introduction to the emergence of GPs in astronomy, present the underlying mathematical theory, and give practical advice conside… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of a starspot on photometry is to reduce the observed (integrated) intensity when on the visible hemisphere. The net effect of many spots is quasiperiodic variability that can be treated as time-correlated noise (Haywood et al 2014;Rajpaul et al 2015;Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey 2023). The TESS photometry of TOI-1347 shows strong rotational variability with maxima/minima occurring roughly every ∼8 days (see the top panel in Figure 3).…”
Section: Stellar Rotation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of a starspot on photometry is to reduce the observed (integrated) intensity when on the visible hemisphere. The net effect of many spots is quasiperiodic variability that can be treated as time-correlated noise (Haywood et al 2014;Rajpaul et al 2015;Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey 2023). The TESS photometry of TOI-1347 shows strong rotational variability with maxima/minima occurring roughly every ∼8 days (see the top panel in Figure 3).…”
Section: Stellar Rotation Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, a GP regressor is composed of a mean function (m; Equation (1)), which is ideally physically motivated, and a covariance function (k; Equation (2)) that captures the details that the mean function has missed. For a more detailed review of GP and its applications in astronomy, we direct the readers to Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey (2023). In this paper, we used the PYTHON package tinygp (Foreman-Mackey 2023) to construct our GP model.…”
Section: A Fully Empirical Gyrochronology Relation With Gaussian Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether we find that a joint GP model better predicts the HPF RVs compared to a Keplerian-only model. However, GP regression can be susceptible to overfitting (e.g., Aigrain & Foreman-Mackey 2023;Blunt et al 2023), leading to systematic biases that affect the interpretation of a planetary signal. This is particularly true for young systems where stellar activity signals are large.…”
Section: Model 2: Keplerian and Quasiperiodic Gaussian Processmentioning
confidence: 99%