2014
DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2014.26.3.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gay Men's HIV Risk Reduction Practices: The Influence of Epistemic Communities in HIV Social and Behavioral Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the rate of switching, or concurrency between, steady sexual partners may increase the risk of STI transmission even in the context of relationships that may be characterised by 'negotiated safety' and strategic positioning (e.g. assuming the insertive role in anal intercourse when HIV negative in a serodiscordant encounter), among other tools for management of risk in open relationships (Hickson et al, 1992;Holt, 2014). In contrast, having any non-steady partners, even without CAI, increased odds of last-year crystal meth use, and having two or more non-steady partners with CAI increased odds of last-year crystal meth use more than six times as much as having two or more steady CAI partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the rate of switching, or concurrency between, steady sexual partners may increase the risk of STI transmission even in the context of relationships that may be characterised by 'negotiated safety' and strategic positioning (e.g. assuming the insertive role in anal intercourse when HIV negative in a serodiscordant encounter), among other tools for management of risk in open relationships (Hickson et al, 1992;Holt, 2014). In contrast, having any non-steady partners, even without CAI, increased odds of last-year crystal meth use, and having two or more non-steady partners with CAI increased odds of last-year crystal meth use more than six times as much as having two or more steady CAI partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could suggest that explanations for sexual risk behaviour in the face of risk of HIV transmission possibly ignore planned CAI, a finding that is reflected in qualitative research on the subject. 26,27 Moreover, CAI in the context of steady partnerships where partners are assumed to be seroconcordant-as in most of the encounters in class 1 -carry a much lower risk for HIV transmission. This is especially important because not all CAI is the same in terms of risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of serosorting in reducing the risk of HIV transmission in HIV‐seronegative gay and bisexual men remains far inferior to consistent use of condoms (Paz‐Bailey et al., ; WHO, ). This inference can be made based on the most recent evidence provided by national and international health organizations and the findings of the current state of the science on the topic (van den Boom et al., ; Chen et al., ; Eaton, Kalichman, et al., ; Holt, ; Kurtz, Buttram, Surratt, & Stall, ; Zablotska et al., ).…”
Section: Discussion and Clinical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, researchers have suggested this practice is more commonly adhered to by HIV‐negative gay and bisexual men than consistent condom use (McFarland et al., ). Holt () asserts that serosorting research began appearing in the international HIV literature around 2006 and 2009. Calculating the exact number of MSM who engage in serosorting is difficult as a consequence of the inherit challenges that come with obtaining representative samples in research on gay and bisexual populations (Meyer & Wilson, ).…”
Section: Literature Review: Serosorting Among Gay and Bisexual Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation