Gaya Kepemimpinan Partisipatif Dan Kecerdasan Emosional Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Dengan Komunikasi Sebagai Moderasi

Abstract

Pengambilan keputusan merupakan salah satu faktor penentu kesuksesan perusahaan. Tidak tepatnya keputusan yang diambil akan menimbulkan masalah dan ketidak nyamanan dalam perusahaan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat sejauhmana gayakepemimpinan partisipatif dan kecerdasan emosional berpengaruh terhadap pengambilan keputusan dengan komunikasi sebagai moderasi pada Bank Syariah Mandiri di Kota Padang. Populasi dalam penelitian ini meliputi seluruh karyawan Bank Syariah Mandiri di kota padang dengan jumlah 101 karyawan. Seluruh karyawan tersebut akan diteliti, sehingga penelitian ini merupakan studi populasi. Analisis data menggunakan Structural Equation Model (SEM) – Pertial Least Square (PLS). Temuan dari hasil penelitian ini bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif dan tidak signifikan antara gaya kepemimpinan partisipatif terhadap pengambilan keputusan. Kecerdasan emosional berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pengambilan keputusan. Kamunikasi sebagai variabel pemoderasi mampu memperkuat pengaruh gaya kepemimpinan partisipatif terhadap pengambilan keputusan. Komunikasi sebagai variabel pemoderasi mampu memperkuat pengaruh kecerdasan emosional terhadap pengambilan keputusan.

The role of sharia banking communication in strengthening decision making's factors

“…So, the participatory leadership has no effect on decision making. The results of this study are not in line with the research of Prianto (2019) and Yeni (2020) which explain that participatory leadership style influences decision making.…”

“…Professionalism was measured from 5 items (Haritsah, 2006): professional devotion, social obligations, independence, belief in regulations, relations with fellow professions. Participatory leadership was measured from 6 items (Yeni, 2020): iniating, regulating, informing, supporting, evaluating, concluding, and summarizing. Communication was measured from 5 items (Katidjan, et all, 2017): submission of information, goal orientation, achievement understanding, unity of meaning and message reception.…”

“…Less coordination among employees because of working culture and company value adjustment may cause some error, inaccurate targets ineffective condition related to professionalism in decision making (Mardiah, et al, 2017). In addition, the level of emotional intelligence possessed to make the right decisions and how the command center upholds high principles of democracy and togetherness that will result in participatory decisions (Yeni, 2020). Participatory decisions able to reduce the dominance when the management try to figure out and unite the opinions.…”

“…Decision making is an approach taken to a problem by collecting data and facts and choosing the best alternative and taking appropriate action (Yeni, 2020). The decisions taken by leaders are usually influenced by their leadership style.…”

“…Indicator variables in this study are (1) decision making is measured by rational considerations, goal orientation, effective, practical, organized, procedural, organizational orientation, alternative options and realization of decisions (Mustofa, 2017) (2) emotional intelligence is measured by self-emotion recognition, emotional management, self-motivation, recognition of environmental emotions and relationship building (Sofyanti, 2016); (3) professionalism is measured by professional devotion, social obligations, independence, regulations belief and relationships with fellow professionals (Haritsah, 2006); (4) participatory leadership is measured by initiating, regulating, informing, supporting, evaluating and summarizing (Yeni, 2020); (5) communication is measured by submission of information, goal orientation, reaching an understanding, unity of meaning and message reception (Katidjan et al, 2017).…”