“…Challenging the prevailing tendencies to focus on abstract categories and generalizations, these thinkers expose the bodily character of political violence (e.g., Sylvester, 2005Sylvester, , 2011Sylvester, , 2012aSylvester, , 2012bScarry, 2005), paying attention to gendered, raced, and sexualized aspects of geopolitics and IR (e.g., Enloe, 1983Enloe, , 1989Enloe, , 2010Iveson, 2010;Katz, 2007;Mayer, 2008;Moser & Clark, 2001;Puar, 2005Puar, , 2017Puar & Rai, 2002;Radcliffe & Westwood, 1993;Sharoni, 2001;Zarkov, 2001). By dislocating the long-established binarism of the global/international/national/public and the intimate/domestic/banal/private, feminist theorists demonstrate how violence operates in multiscalar ways (see, e.g., Brickell, 2015;Cuomo, 2013;Pain, 2014Pain, , 2015Pain & Staeheli, 2014), exposing the continuities of military warfare and everyday violence (Christian & Dowler, 2019;Christian et al, 2016;Cuomo, 1996;Fluri, 2022;Jones, 2023). Such a formulation enables 'the dovetailing of grand geopolitical discourse and lived, quotidian geographies of the home, the street, the border, the combat zone, the factory or the prison camp' (Jones & Sage, 2010, p. 316).…”