2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00833.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gaze behavior and affect at 6 months: predicting clinical outcomes and language development in typically developing infants and infants at risk for autism

Abstract: This paper presents follow-up longitudinal data to research that previously suggested the possibility of abnormal gaze behavior marked by decreased eye contact in a subgroup of 6-month-old infants at risk for autism (Merin et al., 2007). Using eye-tracking data and behavioral data recorded during a live mother-infant interaction involving the still-face procedure, the predictive utility of gaze behavior and affective behaviors at 6 months was examined using diagnostic outcome data obtained longitudinally over … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

37
305
6
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 323 publications
(353 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
37
305
6
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 summarizes studies in which emerging markers over the first 12 months of life were assessed. 22,32,38,45,46,48,49,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Some researchers reported no behavioral differences at the age of 6 months in social communication behaviors 22 or in language or motor development 49,66 between infants who were later diagnosed with ASD and those with a later diagnosis of typical development. Other studies, which have also included outcome measures, suggest that there may be differences during the age range of 6 to 12 months in social attention (social gaze or orienting to name being called), 32,74 atypical sensory behaviors, 32 repetitive or otherwise atypical motor behaviors, and nonverbal communication (differences in gesture use).…”
Section: Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 summarizes studies in which emerging markers over the first 12 months of life were assessed. 22,32,38,45,46,48,49,[71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78] Some researchers reported no behavioral differences at the age of 6 months in social communication behaviors 22 or in language or motor development 49,66 between infants who were later diagnosed with ASD and those with a later diagnosis of typical development. Other studies, which have also included outcome measures, suggest that there may be differences during the age range of 6 to 12 months in social attention (social gaze or orienting to name being called), 32,74 atypical sensory behaviors, 32 repetitive or otherwise atypical motor behaviors, and nonverbal communication (differences in gesture use).…”
Section: Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention has been drawn to atypical behaviors associated with autism. 6,7,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] However, children who have autism do not engage in unusual behavior exclusively, and at the individual level, even experienced clinicians did not always agree on atypicality of behavior. Likewise, typical development is characterized by occasional periods of repetitive play, rigidity, and failure to respond.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the developmental trajectory of social cognition visual attention is given to faces very soon after birth, with specific attention paid to the eye region; and later in infancy at around 6-9 months a preference for looking at faces within multiple object arrays or animated scenes develops (Johnson, Dziurawiec, Ellis, & Morton, 1991;Farroni, Csibra, Simion, & Johnson, 2002;Gliga, Elsabbagh, Andravizou, & Johnson, 2009;Frank, Vul, & Johnson, 2009); for review see . This trajectory is altered from 2 to 12 months in children who go on to receive a diagnosis of ASD, which suggests that gaze behaviour may be one of the earliest markers of atypical social cognition (Young, Merin, Rogers, & Ozonoff, 2009;Ozonoff et al, 2010;Chawarska, Macari, & Shic, 2012;Jones & Klin, 2013;Chawarska, Macari, & Shic, 2013;Wass et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%