The word and non-word learning abilities of toddlers were tested under various conditions of environmental distraction, and evaluated with respect to children's temperamental attentional focus. Thirty-nine children and their mothers visited the lab at child age 21-months, where children were exposed to fast-mapping word learning trials and nonlinguistic sequential learning trials. It was found that both word and nonword-learning was adversely affected by the presentation of environmental distractions. But it was also found that the effect of the distractions sometimes depended on children's level of attentional focus. Specifically, children high in attentional focus were less affected by environmental distractions than children low in attentional focus when attempting to learn from a model, whereas children low in attentional focus demonstrated little learning from the model. Translationally, these results may be of use to child health-care providers investigating possible sources of cognitive and language delay.
Temperament, Distraction, and Learning in ToddlerhoodThe fields of temperament and cognitive development have followed long and productive paths, even though they seem to have done so in relative isolation from one another. Temperament researchers have made strides in identifying the nature of early temperament and its potential biological underpinnings, and they have identified a host of social-emotional sequelae of early individual differences in temperament (e.g., Guerin, Gottfried, Oliver, & Thomas, 2003;Molfese & Molfese, 2000). Cognitive development researchers have also made significant strides toward understanding basic mechanisms underlying attention (e.g., Colombo, 2004;Richards, 2004;Rose, Feldman, & Jankowski, 2004;Ruff & Rothbart, 1996) and memory (e.g., Bauer, 2004;Hayne, 2004), among other cognitive domains. Unfortunately, few researchers have undertaken empirical efforts to document interrelations between temperament and basic cognition (e.g., Wolfe & Bell, 2004); although Fagen and colleagues have amply demonstrated that aspects of temperamental fussiness (i.e., affective distress) negatively impact children's performance on cognitive tasks (Fagen, Ohr, Fleckenstein, & Ribner, 1985;Fagen, Ohr, Singer, & Fleckenstein, 1987;Fleckenstein & Fagen, 1994). Much would be gained were researchers able to link individual differences in cognitive function to individual differences in any of a number of domains of temperament, because such an effort would likely inform a better understanding of intra domain individual differences.To the extent that temperament-cognitive relationships have been examined, a major focus seems to have been on temperament-language relationships (specifically vocabulary, e.g., Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Wallace E. Dixon, Jr., Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University, P.O. Box 70649, Johnson City, TN,37614. E-mail: dixonw@etsu.edu.. Author Note This work was supported by a NIH/NICHD Grant HD043865 to the first au...