2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06356.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GCD+: a new chemodynamical approach to modelling supernovae and chemical enrichment in elliptical galaxies

Abstract: We have developed a new galactic chemodynamical evolution code, called gcd+, for studies of galaxy formation and evolution. This code is based on our original three‐dimensional tree N‐body/smoothed particle hydrodynamics code which includes self‐gravity, hydrodynamics, radiative cooling, star formation, supernova feedback and metal enrichment. gcd+ includes a new Type II (SNe II) and Ia (SNe Ia) supernovae model, taking into account the lifetime of progenitor stars and chemical enrichment from intermediate‐mas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
274
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
(165 reference statements)
20
274
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, no metallicity gradient is expected. Brook et al (2005) used the cold dark matter chemodynamical galaxy formation code GCD+ (Kawata & Gibson 2003) to simulate the formation of four Milky-Way-like galaxies. In the four cases, a thick disc appears by accretion of gas-rich building blocks and in-situ (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion: Thick Disc Gradient Versus Formation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, no metallicity gradient is expected. Brook et al (2005) used the cold dark matter chemodynamical galaxy formation code GCD+ (Kawata & Gibson 2003) to simulate the formation of four Milky-Way-like galaxies. In the four cases, a thick disc appears by accretion of gas-rich building blocks and in-situ (i.e.…”
Section: Discussion: Thick Disc Gradient Versus Formation Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models incorporate a galaxy formation process that is more similar to the monolithic one (e.g. Kawata & Gibson 2003), 8 With the additional caveat that the stellar value values are robust only in a relative sense. A larger contribution from SNeII may be invoked to explain the observed abundance pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…α-elements scale strongly with mass, between 8 and 40 solar masses, while the iron value does not. If we assume that stars with masses greater than 40 solar masses all have yields the same as stars at 40 solar masses (as in Few et al 2012;Kawata & Gibson 2003), we cannot arrive at a solution for silicon. We therefore only include stars with masses of up to 40 solar masses in our SNII yield tables.…”
Section: Making Chemical Evolution Tracks (Part A)mentioning
confidence: 99%