Frontiers in Automobile and Mechanical Engineering -2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/fame.2010.5714820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gear pair design optimization by Genetic Algorithm and FEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-objective optimizations (MOO) of cylindrical gears have also been performed, sometimes associated with contradictory require-ments. As an example, the following studies can be emphasised: (i) Sanghvi et al optimized the load carrying capacity and volume [5]; (ii) Yao optimized the bearing capacity coefficient, spur gear efficiency and centre distance [6]; (iii) Padmanabhan et al minimized the centre distance and overall mass, while improving performance in terms of transmitted power and gear efficiency [7]; (iv) Li et al minimized, the transmission error, contact stress and gearbox volume [8]; (v) Patil et al minimized the power losses and gearbox volume [9]. In these works, the gear design macrogeometry parameters were chosen as decision variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-objective optimizations (MOO) of cylindrical gears have also been performed, sometimes associated with contradictory require-ments. As an example, the following studies can be emphasised: (i) Sanghvi et al optimized the load carrying capacity and volume [5]; (ii) Yao optimized the bearing capacity coefficient, spur gear efficiency and centre distance [6]; (iii) Padmanabhan et al minimized the centre distance and overall mass, while improving performance in terms of transmitted power and gear efficiency [7]; (iv) Li et al minimized, the transmission error, contact stress and gearbox volume [8]; (v) Patil et al minimized the power losses and gearbox volume [9]. In these works, the gear design macrogeometry parameters were chosen as decision variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the investigation was on the structural soundness of current wheels and compute the stresses within them by use of finite element modelling and solution techniques. The accounted for the impact of the stress value range we acquired from Finite Element Analysis (FEA) to derive more precise estimates of the pressure needed to cause the wheel to expand (Padmanabhan et al 2010;Joel et al 2021;Somayaji et al 2022). The purpose of the research is to find, with the use of finite element analysis ways in which the existing wheels-over design might be made easier to implement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…center distance, bearing capacity coefficient, and meshing efficiency of the spur gear using NSGA-II algorithm and decision maker which consists to select the optimal solution from Pareto frontier obtained from NSGA-II [20]. Padmanabhan et al used GA and analytic method, to minimize overall weight and center distance while maximizing the power delivered by the gear pair and efficiency of a spur gear pair, by considering module, tooth number and thickness as design variables [21]. Wei et al used an adaptive genetic algorithm to minimize gearbox volume, transmission error and contact stress using various design variables [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%