2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(03)00011-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gear tooth stiffness reduction measurement using modal analysis and its use in wear fault severity assessment of spur gears

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stiffness reduction is commonly used in dynamic gear mesh models to represent tooth surface defects [19,60,61]. Tooth surface wear can cause sliding and the normal load amplitudes to vary with the position of the contact on the tooth surfaces, in turn this can cause difficulties with the computation of load distributions for the gears [62].…”
Section: Modelling Tooth Wear In Helical Gearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiffness reduction is commonly used in dynamic gear mesh models to represent tooth surface defects [19,60,61]. Tooth surface wear can cause sliding and the normal load amplitudes to vary with the position of the contact on the tooth surfaces, in turn this can cause difficulties with the computation of load distributions for the gears [62].…”
Section: Modelling Tooth Wear In Helical Gearsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local damage in gear teeth generates a local decrease in mesh stiffness [17]; as a consequence the damage in gears produce modulation effects modifying either the magnitude or the phase of the vibration signal picked up by the transducers. These effects occur during the engagement of the faulted teeth, but are repeated once per revolution of the gear.…”
Section: Damage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been performed in the past to determine the influence of the aforementioned mesh compliance in gear dynamics [16,17]. This study aims to detect this torsional stiffness change on-line which implies an extra feature over such techniques [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The common nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods to monitor flaws in splines are debris monitoring, acoustic emission, and vibration. The methods can be applied individually [1][2][3][4][5][6] or concurrently [7,8]. While debris monitoring does not require any electronics, it is simple to interpret and has excellent sensitivity to wear-related failure; this method is insufficient to non-benign cracks as no debris is produced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%