Gearbox Tooth Cut Fault Diagnostics Using Acoustic Emission and Vibration Sensors — A Comparative Study

Abstract

In recent years, acoustic emission (AE) sensors and AE-based techniques have been developed and tested for gearbox fault diagnosis. In general, AE-based techniques require much higher sampling rates than vibration analysis-based techniques for gearbox fault diagnosis. Therefore, it is questionable whether an AE-based technique would give a better or at least the same performance as the vibration analysis-based techniques using the same sampling rate. To answer the question, this paper presents a comparative study for gearbox tooth damage level diagnostics using AE and vibration measurements, the first known attempt to compare the gearbox fault diagnostic performance of AE- and vibration analysis-based approaches using the same sampling rate. Partial tooth cut faults are seeded in a gearbox test rig and experimentally tested in a laboratory. Results have shown that the AE-based approach has the potential to differentiate gear tooth damage levels in comparison with the vibration-based approach. While vibration signals are easily affected by mechanical resonance, the AE signals show more stable performance.

A review of diagnostics and prognostics of low-speed machinery towards wind turbine farm-level health management

“…They explain that factors like temperature of the lubrication can have significant effect on acoustic emission. However, Qu et al [97] compared vibration and acoustic emission data from wind turbine drivetrain for detection of gear tooth crack. They concluded that the AE technique is less susceptible to background mechanical noise than vibration sensing and is more sensitive to tooth damage in low rotational speeds.…”

On the Use of a Single Piezoelectric Strain Sensor for Wind Turbine Planetary Gearbox Fault Diagnosis

“…After TSA is computed, any kind of fault diagnostic CIs can be evaluated. Although successful TSA applications to many types of signals such as vibration and acoustic emission signals have been reported in the literature [40], [41], application of TSA to PE strain signal processing for PGB fault diagnosis has not yet been reported.…”

A Novel Personalized Diagnosis Methodology Using Numerical Simulation and an Intelligent Method to Detect Faults in a Shaft

“…He et al [11] proposed a data mining-based diagnostic system using acoustic emission (AE) signals to detect faults in full ceramic bearings. They further developed a series of methods to identify faults in plastic bearings [12], gearbox tooth cut faults [13], planetary gearbox faults [14], etc.…”