2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00280-019-03788-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gefitinib exposure and occurrence of interstitial lung disease in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract: Purpose A prospective, multicenter, large-scale cohort with a nested case–control study (NCT00252759) was conducted to identify and quantify risk factors for interstitial lung disease (ILD) in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who received gefitinib. This study reports the association between gefitinib exposure and the occurrence of ILD. Methods A total of 1891 gefitinib plasma concentrations from 336 patients were measured after first dose, at steady st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ILD rate associated with osimertinib in this analysis was 6.8%, and fatal outcomes resulting from ILD occurred in 0.8% (11.8% of the ILD population). In post-marketing studies of gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, ILD rates ranging from 4.3 to 15.2% have been reported ( 28–30 ). In terms of ILD mortality rate, among the latter studies, the death rate from ILD was 1.5% (153/9909) (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ILD rate associated with osimertinib in this analysis was 6.8%, and fatal outcomes resulting from ILD occurred in 0.8% (11.8% of the ILD population). In post-marketing studies of gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, ILD rates ranging from 4.3 to 15.2% have been reported ( 28–30 ). In terms of ILD mortality rate, among the latter studies, the death rate from ILD was 1.5% (153/9909) (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUC 0–24 value of gefitinib observed in patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 41–73 years) at a dose of 225 mg was 1986 ng h/mL which is equivalent to 4.44 µM h. Because the relationship between the gefitinib dose and its AUC were reported to be linear [ 23 , 24 ], the AUC 0–24 value of gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg in younger patients was estimated to be 4.9 µM h, which is somewhat lower than the 6.17 ± 1.9 µM h obtained in elderly patients. A population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the CL/F value of gefitinib was negatively correlated with age [ 25 ]. Taking these results into account, systemic exposure to gefitinib in elderly patients may be slightly higher than that in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e drug exposure in vivo has a close relation with the treatment efficacy and/or adverse reaction, and it was still the key point for the clinical optimization of drug dose [17][18][19][20][21]. ere were differences in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion between patients and within patients, and several studies in recent years were also reported [22][23][24].…”
Section: Application Of Clinical Samples Treated By Tkismentioning
confidence: 99%