1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(98)90072-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In phase II studies., several authors investigated two schedules of different drug doses. Using both drugs administered on days 1-8-15., recycled every 4 weeks., the response rate ranged from 19 to 72% and MST from 7 to 12 months [125][126][127][128][129][130]; with both drugs administered on days 1-8., recycled every 3 weeks., the response rate varied from 22% to 53% and MST from 8 to 12.6 months [131][132][133][134][135][136][137]. These two schedules have similar activity and toxicity., but the latter 3-week schedule seems to be more manageable.…”
Section: Non-platin-based Combination Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In phase II studies., several authors investigated two schedules of different drug doses. Using both drugs administered on days 1-8-15., recycled every 4 weeks., the response rate ranged from 19 to 72% and MST from 7 to 12 months [125][126][127][128][129][130]; with both drugs administered on days 1-8., recycled every 3 weeks., the response rate varied from 22% to 53% and MST from 8 to 12.6 months [131][132][133][134][135][136][137]. These two schedules have similar activity and toxicity., but the latter 3-week schedule seems to be more manageable.…”
Section: Non-platin-based Combination Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view., this dose level seems to be the optimal choice for future phase III trials., being similarly active and less toxic than the other two dose-levels studied. Table 11 summarises gemcitabine plus vinorelbine phase II studies [125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137]. Overall., noncisplatin-based chemotherapy., and particularly., gemcitabine plus vinorelbine combination., has been shown to be active and well-tolerated in phase II studies., so comparative phase III trials of these drug combination versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy are warranted.…”
Section: Non-platin-based Combination Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%