2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin versus Gemcitabine plus Carboplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium: Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
178
3
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
178
3
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, MVAC or CMV is the regimen of choice.The regimen of GC has gained favor recently because it is easy to administer and has a less toxic profile. Both cisplatin and carboplatin have been used in the past, although a randomized phase II study showed carboplatin to be inferior to cisplatin in first-line treatment of metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium [41]. Although the data were descriptive in nature without statistical comparisons and the trial was not designed with sufficient power to detect significant differences between arms in terms of efficacy, cisplatin was used preferentially over carboplatin in the neoadjuvant setting based on extrapolation of the previously mentioned data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, MVAC or CMV is the regimen of choice.The regimen of GC has gained favor recently because it is easy to administer and has a less toxic profile. Both cisplatin and carboplatin have been used in the past, although a randomized phase II study showed carboplatin to be inferior to cisplatin in first-line treatment of metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium [41]. Although the data were descriptive in nature without statistical comparisons and the trial was not designed with sufficient power to detect significant differences between arms in terms of efficacy, cisplatin was used preferentially over carboplatin in the neoadjuvant setting based on extrapolation of the previously mentioned data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a carboplatin regimen was investigated alongside gemcitabine in phase ii trials that did not exclude patients fit to receive cisplatin, resulting in ors of 56% and 59% and a median os of only 10 months [27][28][29] . In a phase ii randomized trial of gc versus gemcitabine with carboplatin, better response rates were observed with gc (66% vs. 35%) without significant differences in toxicity profile 30 . Based on the foregoing findings, it became evident that carboplatin is inferior to cisplatin.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with GC, PGC is associated with a significant improvement in the OS among patients with primary bladder cancer (median, 16 vs. 12 months; hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence intervals, 0.66-0.97), however, with increased incidence of serious grade III and IV toxicities (8). For patients with impaired renal function, carboplatin-based regimens can be used as the first-line for metastatic TCC, however, its efficacy remains to be evaluated with larger phase III trials (9). Non-platinum regimens, particularly those combining gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or docetaxel have also shown promising results in several phase II studies (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%