2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52486-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Abstract: Overall survival in a phase III study for metastatic pancreatic cancer has significantly improved with gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel. However, to date, there is limited data on the efficacy and safety of its use for patients with locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line GEM plus nab-paclitaxel for LA or BRPC. We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed, untreated LA or BRPC who… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, FOLFIRINOX with gemcitabine transitions 52% patients with borderline resectable disease to R0 outcomes (25). Retrospective data analysis of 30 patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC, who received neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with and without subsequent S-1 therapy reveals that eight were amenable for surgery, and six achieved R0 resection (26). Collectively, this work demonstrates the potential to improve survival outcomes in traditionally non-operable patients and to expand current curative intent therapy.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Pancreatic Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Similarly, FOLFIRINOX with gemcitabine transitions 52% patients with borderline resectable disease to R0 outcomes (25). Retrospective data analysis of 30 patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC, who received neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, with and without subsequent S-1 therapy reveals that eight were amenable for surgery, and six achieved R0 resection (26). Collectively, this work demonstrates the potential to improve survival outcomes in traditionally non-operable patients and to expand current curative intent therapy.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Pancreatic Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Pooled proportions of prospective studies (n = 396) showed an overall resection rate of 42% (95% CI 24-61%) and an R0 resection rate of 22% (95% CI 10-36%) (Figure S1). [26,28,29,31,33,35,[37][38][39][40][44][45][46]) only. Due to heterogeneity among studies, a random effects model was used.…”
Section: Resection Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2. Forest plots showing the pooled proportions of resections and R0 resections (defined as absence of tumor at the margin or a minimum distance between tumor and margin of >1 mm) of all patients (n = 739, refs [26,[28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preoperative chemotherapy (CTx) or chemoradiotherapy (CRTx) prolongs survival in pancreatic cancer patients [6,7]. However, 20-70% of patients are surgical candidates after CTx or CRTx, and indications for surgery vary between institutions [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%