2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gemcitabine with either paclitaxel or vinorelbine vs paclitaxel or gemcitabine alone for elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess whether a combination of gemcitabine (GEM) with either paclitaxel (PTX) or vinorelbine (VNR) could be more effective than GEM or PTX alone in elderly or unfit advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. A total of 264 NSCLC patients aged 470 years with ECOG performance status (PS)p2, or younger with PS ¼ 2, were randomly treated with: GEM 1200 mg m À2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; PTX 100 mg m À2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days; GEM 1000 mg m À2 plus PTX 80 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for exclusion were not stated in eight studies [30,31,40,42,43,48,57,64], whereas we were unable to assess if any exclusion criteria were applied in a trial published in Chinese only [46]. Response was assessed according to the World Health Organization standard criteria [72] in 19 trials [22,23,25,29,32,34,35,39,44,45,47,49,50,52,53,59,62,65,68], according to the Southwest Oncology Group guidelines [73] in two studies [21,24], and according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [74] in four trials [60,61,66,67].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reasons for exclusion were not stated in eight studies [30,31,40,42,43,48,57,64], whereas we were unable to assess if any exclusion criteria were applied in a trial published in Chinese only [46]. Response was assessed according to the World Health Organization standard criteria [72] in 19 trials [22,23,25,29,32,34,35,39,44,45,47,49,50,52,53,59,62,65,68], according to the Southwest Oncology Group guidelines [73] in two studies [21,24], and according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [74] in four trials [60,61,66,67].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the remaining 45 trials [21-25, 29 -68], ineligible treatment arms-that is, triplets [30,63], single-agent therapies [44], platinum combinations with irinotecan or first-and second-generation drugs [36,38], or sequential treatment arms [39]-were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Identification Of Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of this comparison is the relatively low number of patients receiving various treatment regimens based on carboplatin (n = 33). Thirdly, the analysis showed the significant influence of the performance status and the age of patients on their overall survival, which was also observed in the clinical studies addressed for the patients in older age groups [22,23]. Our study also has a few potential drawbacks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Comella and colleagues evaluated paclitaxel and gemcitabine in two randomized phase II studies [50,51]. Doublet treatment comprising paclitaxelgemcitabine or gemcitabine-vinorelbine was associated with a significantly longer OS time compared with paclitaxel or gemcitabine monotherapy (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59 -0.99), without an greater toxicity [51].…”
Section: First-line Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%