Gender, Age and Teaching Experiences Differences in Decision-Making Behaviours of Members of Selected Kenyan Secondary School Disciplinary Panels

Abstract

The study investigated gender, age and teaching experiences differences in decision-making behaviours of members of selected Kenyan secondary school disciplinary panels.Mixed Methods design was adopted for the study. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Study sample comprised 78 participants drawn from ten secondary school disciplinary panels. Participants comprised 45 males and 33 females, clustered into four age groups of-29 years (n=21), 30-39 years (n=28), 40-49 years (n=14), and 50-59 years (n=15); and six teaching experience categories of 1-5 years (n=33), 6-10 years (n=14), 11-15 years (n=5), 16-20 years (n=6), 21-25 years (n=8), and 26-30 years (n=12).Data analysis results revealed gender, age and experience differences in decision-making behaviours of members of disciplinary panels who participated in the study. Male participants were found to tend towards risky decision-making behaviours while female participants tended towards cautious decision-making behaviours. Younger and less experienced participants were also found to be risky in their decision-making behaviours also tended panel members made risky pre-disciplinary hearing decision-making behaviours, while their older and more experienced counterparts were more cautious. Based on the findings of this study it is recommended that, in order to cater for the diverse nature of student behaviour problems and to effectively manage the same, consideration must be given to delicate balance of age, gender and experience in the composition of members of a school disciplinary panel.

Does Information Technology Experience Matter? A Case of Secondary Schools of Kaduna State Nigeria

“…Ünal and Ünal (2012) found that older teachers (age 45 years or more) are more active in teaching and better in classroom management skills as compared to younger teachers in high school; the more you teach, the more you acquire skills and bring improvement in the methodology of teaching. This view is buttressed by Aloka and Bojuwoye (2013) and they found that newly appointed teachers regularly end up making additional risky decisions and do not examine the background carefully when dealing with students' disciplinary snags due to the lack of experience, irresponsibility and immaturity as compared to older teachers. Putman (2012) confirmed that the more years of teaching experience teachers have, the more advanced is the level of their self-efficacies to involve students and manage the classroom.…”

Social comparison influences on disciplinary panels: a brief qualitative study in Kenyan secondary schools

“…Within Kenyan secondary schools, each disciplinary panel operates as a small social group to make decisions on the management o f an array o f student disciplinary or behaviour problems such as bullying, vandalism, stealing, alcohol and drug abuse, truancy, and non-com pletion o f hom ework assignments and other forms o f problem behaviours (Aloka, 2012;Aloka & Bojuwoye, 2013 ). Based on the information available during disciplinary hearings, disciplinary panel members come to a group decision leading to recom m endations on how best to manage student behaviour problems.…”

Persuasive Argument as a Determinant of Group Polarization: A study of Selected Kenyan Secondary School Disciplinary Panels

“…Some of the various maladaptive behaviours found among Kenyan school children include bullying, vandalism, stealing, alcohol and drug abuse, truancy, not completing homework assignments and other forms of problem behaviours (Aloka & Bojuwoye, 2013). These problem behaviours impact negatively on the teaching and learning enterprises of schools as well as on the safety and security of the school environment (Aloka, 2012).…”

“…These terms of references guide the panel members' behaviours including the roles and responsibilities members are to play in order for the panel to accomplish what is expected of it. The terms of reference for the disciplinary panel serve as goals which guide members' behaviours in terms of roles and responsibilities leading to decisions of the panel (Aloka & Bojuwoye, 2013). The immediate goal is to provide appropriate response to student disciplinary problems being treated by the panel.…”