2005
DOI: 10.1109/tem.2004.839967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Age Differences in Employee Decisions About New Technology: An Extension to the Theory of Planned Behavior

Abstract: This research extends the theory of planned behavior by incorporating gender and age as moderators of user perceptions and individual adoption and sustained use of technology in the workplace. Individual reactions and technology use behavior were studied over a six-month period among 342 workers being introduced to a new software technology application. While previous studies in the literature have reported gender or age differences separately, the pattern of results from the study reported here indicated that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
270
11
15

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
29
270
11
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Morris et al (2005), we propose that, in the m-banking context, there are no gender differences in the influence of ATT on m-banking adoption:…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Gender On Adoption Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Morris et al (2005), we propose that, in the m-banking context, there are no gender differences in the influence of ATT on m-banking adoption:…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Gender On Adoption Intentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the seminal publication on workflow technology by Georgakopoulos et al [22], researchers have been concerned with enhancing its features. Various efforts have focused on the architectural side of WfMSs, such as its distribution and scalability, the transactional properties that underlie their functioning, and the integration with web services [41,38,24]. Most efforts in the technology-oriented stream stem from apprehension about the rigidity of early WfMSs.…”
Section: Prior Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As regards worker age, we operationalized this concept in a way consistent with prior IS research on age and with the inhibitory deficit theory of cognitive aging by comparing chronologically younger to older workers [31,33]. We relied on OECD definitions to define worker age: younger workers were defined as those between 16 and 29 years of age, whereas older workers were defined as those between 50 and 64 years of age (i.e., before retirement age, [23]).…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%