Gender and Crime: Toward a Gendered Theory of Female Offending

Abstract

Criminologists agree that the gender gap in crime is universal: Women are always and everywhere less likely than men to commit criminal acts. The experts disagree, however, on a number of key issues: Is the gender gap stable or variant over time and across space? If there is variance, how may it best be explained? Are the causes of female crime distinct from or similar to those of male crime? Can traditional sociological theories of crime explain female crime and the gender gap in crime? Do gender-neutral or gender-specific theories hold the most explanatory promise? In this chapter we first examine patterns of female offending and the gender gap. Second, we review the “gender equality hypothesis” as well as several recent developments in theorizing about gender differences in crime. Third, we expand on a gendered paradigm for explaining female crime first sketched elsewhere. We conclude with recommendations for future work.

Domestic dogs in rural area of fragmented Atlantic Forest: potential threats to wild animals

“…Male dogs exposed to men react with fewer interactive social behaviors than when exposed to women (WELLS & HEPPER, 1999). Considering that most owners raise dogs to guard and most theft crimes are attributed to men (STEFFENSMEIER & ALLAN, 1996), the preference for male dogs compared to females may be explained by the subtle owners' perception of male dogs' aggressiveness towards men. Another reason is the lack of control of females' estrous cycle, despite enshrined techniques such as surgery and pharmacological control.…”

An Investigation of Juvenile Gang Membership and Psychopathic Behavior: Evidence from Multilinear Analysis

“…Interestingly enough we discovered that race and sex were significantly also related to the externalization (Facet 2) of CD/ODD symptoms. As supported with the extant literature males are more likely to be involved with various forms of delinquency/antisocial behavior than their female counterparts (Steffensmeier & Allan, 1996;Uggen & Kruttschnitt, 1998;Moffit, 2001;Broidy, Cauffman, Espelage, Mazerolle, & Piquero, 2003;Synder & Sickmund, 2006). Interestingly, the results display that females were more likely to possess internalized (Facet 1) symptoms associated with CD/ODD, therefore it may be a sex difference that also must be considered within the (CD/ODD) variant perspective proposed by (Fowles & Dino, 2009).…”

Assessment of the Connection of Antisocial-Criminal Behavior, Corruption and Depression in College Students

“…In the case of men, it is socially acceptable that they be daring, engage in risky behavior and test themselves before certain social demands (Juárez et al, 1998), as well as the findings of research reporting a link between males and criminal behavior, thus reinforcing the perception of gender differences in general population, where men are more prone to be involved in criminal behavior. It should be mentioned that the aforementioned influence also presents itself in ASSESSMENT OF THE CONNECTION OF ANTISOCIAL-CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR 137 the scientific community and it has had some consequences; for example, a great amount of scientific production on Criminology has only revolve around male samples, thus creating a bias in the interpretation of criminal behavior in women (Steffensmeier & Allan, 1996).…”