Handbook of Giftedness in Children 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-74401-8_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and Giftedness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the definition which was used here was the minimal and most consensual one [1]. Secondly, while the gifted and normative groups were matched for sex, thus allowing a control for boys' overrepresentation in the former—which is also found in the general population of gifted [52]—when comparing both, we did not control the effect of parental high academic levels—which is another long known feature of gifted children [15]—on behavioral profiles. However, since our first hypothesis was only descriptive, statistical control of socioeconomic variables was unneeded; incidentally, considering that high academic levels of parents are associated with lower child behavioral problems [53], such a statistical control would probably have amplified contrasts between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the definition which was used here was the minimal and most consensual one [1]. Secondly, while the gifted and normative groups were matched for sex, thus allowing a control for boys' overrepresentation in the former—which is also found in the general population of gifted [52]—when comparing both, we did not control the effect of parental high academic levels—which is another long known feature of gifted children [15]—on behavioral profiles. However, since our first hypothesis was only descriptive, statistical control of socioeconomic variables was unneeded; incidentally, considering that high academic levels of parents are associated with lower child behavioral problems [53], such a statistical control would probably have amplified contrasts between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviors of "blending in" or "pretending to be normal" have been described earlier by Coleman (1985) as not admitting a test was easy, asking questions one already knows the answers to, not raising hand or volunteering answers, and purposefully trying to be vague about accomplishments or grades, just to name a few. Gifted girls have been known to take on these behaviors to avoid being seen as unattractive (Reis and Hébert, 2008) or feeling alienated (Fahlman, 2004) as I saw in Ivey and Hannah Jane's (re) fractional narratives.…”
Section: Theoretical Justificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%