Gender and Intersectionality in Business and Human Rights Scholarship

Abstract

In this article, we explore what intersectionality, as an analytic tool, can contribute to business and human rights (BHR) scholarship. To date, few BHR scholars have explicitly engaged in intersectional analysis. While gender analysis of BHR issues remains crucial to expose inequality in business activity, we argue that engagement with intersectionality can enrich and support this and other BHR scholarship. Intersectional approaches allow us to move beyond single-axis analysis, contest simplistic representations about gender issues and expose the complexity of human relations. It draws our attention to structures that sustain disadvantage such as racism, colonialism, social and economic marginalization and systematic discrimination. Moreover, intersectionality emphasizes the need to centre the contributions of those who have been marginalized. It can be used to challenge the legitimacy of the state and support subaltern, decolonized or postcolonial, including indigenous, perspectives. Adopting an intersectional approach can help problematize the neoliberal capitalist system and its constructs, in which the BHR normative framework is embedded, calling into question the reification of economic growth and its impact on individuals, communities and the planet. We must, however, remain cautious of attempts to co-opt intersectionality in the service of neoliberalism and remain conscious of our own privilege and discursive practices.

Epistemic Injustice and Epistemic Resistance: An Intersectional Study of Women’s Entrepreneurship Under Occupation and Patriarchy

“…In this study, underpinned by the theory of epistemic injustice, we incorporate intersectionality for its potential to contribute to social justice and human rights (Handl et al, 2022). In the following section, we explain how we aim to center the voices of an overlooked segment of entrepreneurs, by illustrating their narratives of the epistemic injustices they endure in terms of their multiple identities as IDPs, as women, and as Palestinians at the hands of the oppressive institutions of occupation and patriarchy.…”

Legal Reform and Change: Research on Legal Reform Processes and their Impact on Society. Analysis of Factors that Facilitate or Hinder Legal Change, Including Political, Social, and Economic Factors

“…Recognizing the interconnectedness of these challenges, scholars have increasingly explored the intersectionality of climate change, technology, and shifting sociocultural norms within legal systems (Phuong, et.al., 2023;Handl, et. al., 2022).…”

Forget me not: demarginalising trailblazing and leading Black women’s WEIRD industrial, organisational, and societal career experiences with “power” in the world’s top music industry ecosystems

“…To theoretically re-situate the research, it was advantageous to use an intersectionality conceptual framework (Handl, et al, 2022;Haynes, et al, 2020) to critically examine and analyse the multidimensionality of Black women's career experiencesat the industrial, organisational, and societal levels -as trailblazers and leaders of the industry. By adopting "the four levels of oppression" framework, which I drew from Jones (2001) 217 , as well as the American Psychological Association (2021), I applicably used it to define the contours of how complex misogynoirism 218 (CM), is framed in this project (see Figure 82), building off of Bailey's (2014Bailey's ( ) (2016Bailey's ( ) (2018 popularised coinage of the term "misogynoir".…”

“…The data makes a case for the need to eradicate human relational dysfunction, that is facilitating and reinforcing systemic biases and harms 239 in organisations. To offer a couple of exemplary tools to identify potential fault lines (van Knippenberg, et al, 2010) the following suggestions are merely considerations, as there is not a "one size fits all approach" to correcting course (Handl, et al, 2022).…”

“…For clarity, I am looking at both the "politics of identity"(Bryan, et al, 2018), "identity politics"(Hull, et al, 2015) in respect to "power structures" and "relational power"(Collins, 2019), with human rights and social justice(Moradi & Grzanka, 2017) at the forefront(Handl, et al, 2022).136 As being mediated by these systems of power and human practices(Braun & Clarke, 2022b) …”