As users' psychological involvement with social media enters a bottleneck, social media fatigue (SMF) is silently growing. Numerous studies investigating the relationship between social media use and SMF have shown disparate results, leading to substantial uncertainty of SMF in relation to different types of social media use. To clarify this controversy, this study used the three-level meta-analytic method to quantitatively synthesize 121 studies with 213 effect sizes (N = 55,896). No significant publication bias was detected. Results showed that SMF was highly positively related to both discontinuous use (r = .46) and problematic use (r = .43), but negligibly related to general use (r = .09). Moderator analyses indicated that the age of the sample, assessment mode, and type of social media moderated the relationship between SMF and social media use. These findings suggest a widespread "SMF paradox" among social media users, in which they have a negative attitude toward social media but still rely heavily on it and do not significantly reduce the intensity of their use. Instead, they may tend to engage in passive use. We attempted to explain this phenomenon from the three-dimensional perspective of social media use.
Public Policy Relevance StatementThe question of whether fatigued users truly flee social media has been a topic of controversy in previous studies. To address this issue, this meta-analysis examined the association between social media fatigue (SMF) and social media use based on data from over 55,000 participants in 121 longitudinal studies. The findings suggest the existence of an SMF paradox; that is, although fatigued users have negative attitudes toward social media, they also exhibit high psychological dependence, which leads them to maintain their social media use rather than reducing or abandoning it. Instead, they may tend to engage in passive use.