2020
DOI: 10.5117/tvgn2020.2.001.fokk
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and open science/scholarship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for all areas of psychology to participate equally and inclusively in open science, all areas of psychology should be considered equal to begin with (Fokken & van Kessel, 2020). To date, the principles and practices of feminist psychology have historically been marginalized from mainstream psychology (Eagly & Riger, 2014;MacArthur & Shields, 2014;Rutherford et al, 2010).…”
Section: Feminist Psychology Research As a Marginalized Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, for all areas of psychology to participate equally and inclusively in open science, all areas of psychology should be considered equal to begin with (Fokken & van Kessel, 2020). To date, the principles and practices of feminist psychology have historically been marginalized from mainstream psychology (Eagly & Riger, 2014;MacArthur & Shields, 2014;Rutherford et al, 2010).…”
Section: Feminist Psychology Research As a Marginalized Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, feminist ECRs may also face heightened pressures when engaging in open science spaces, or indeed academia more widely (e.g., see Fokken & van Kessel, 2020). For example, some scholars have suggested that making mistakes in open science processes, such as during the pre-registration procedure, are likely to “normalize the humanness of research” and thus improve confidence in the research process (Kathawalla et al, 2021, p. 21).…”
Section: Navigating Open Science As Early Career Feminist Researchersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation