2019
DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2019.1692765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender and organizational performance in business succession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Standing out here are the gender stereotypes presented in the theory (e.g. Hentschel et al ., 2020; Welter, 2020; Soost and Moog, 2019; Aldamiz-Echevarría et al ., 2017; Jennings and McDougald, 2007; Kepler and Shane, 2007). In this study, it was stated that women have better organizing and communication skills and sensitivity, which supports the studies by Danes et al .…”
Section: Case Studies: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Standing out here are the gender stereotypes presented in the theory (e.g. Hentschel et al ., 2020; Welter, 2020; Soost and Moog, 2019; Aldamiz-Echevarría et al ., 2017; Jennings and McDougald, 2007; Kepler and Shane, 2007). In this study, it was stated that women have better organizing and communication skills and sensitivity, which supports the studies by Danes et al .…”
Section: Case Studies: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than half of businesswomen are involved in activities other than running their own business, such as working or caring for their families. Among businesswomen who work part-time, around half became part-time businesswomen due to family activities, whereas only a small proportion of part-time businessmen take on similar obligations (Marlow, 1997; Verheul and Thurik, 2001; Soost and Moog, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Groundingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Profitability variables used for the included studies were sales, sales growth, and profits. 71% of the studies examined utilized profitability variables for the measurement of entrepreneurial success (Berge et al, 2019;Mersha et al, 2019;Fairlie et al, 2009;Soost et al, 2019, Demartini, 2018Collins, 2007). Data included using profitability measurements ranged in sample size from 110 participants to 38,030 participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of the receiving process on all of these levels within the context of gender highlights the level of complexity of the problem investigated Differences in perception due to gender have been presented in the literature for many years. There are general theories explaining the reasons for these differences: 1) behavioral economics theory based on profound biologic factors (Cheng, 2019;Zettler et al, 2022), 2) cultural theory based on the influence of culture-shaping individuals' criteria and assessments according to these criteria (Eger, Mičik, Gangur, & Řehoř, 2019;Le, 2021), 3) feminist theory based on class approach and consequences flowing from the favoring of women by male-dominated societies (Neculaesei, 2015;Soost & Moog, 2021). We can apply all of these basic theories to the arts, but explaining these differences is not easy-or even possible.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%