Gender-Based Violence Beliefs and Stereotypes: Cross-Cultural Comparison Across Three

Abstract

Article HistoryCultural values, beliefs, and stereotypes have significant effects on violence against women across societies but knowledge about gender-based violence beliefs and stereotypes across societies is sparse. Using multiple theoretical perspectives (e.g., feminist theory, varieties of patriarchy, social dominance theory, and ambivalent sexism) and human development and the Gender Inequality Index, this study examined beliefs about relationship violence against women and gender beliefs and stereotypes across the United States, South Africa, and Nigeria. Findings from the cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of 363 respondents in the three countries suggested that gender-based violence beliefs and stereotypes differed across countries. Specifically, respondents in Nigeria were more likely to endorse physical violence, psychological manipulation and control, sexual violence, sexual submissiveness of women, emotional stereotypes about women, and sexual stereotypes about men than respondents in the United States or South Africa. Respondents in the United States were less likely to endorse emotional stereotypes about women and sexual stereotypes about men than respondents in South Africa. Similarly, male respondents were more likely than female respondents to endorse psychological manipulation and control of women. Findings highlight differential effects of patriarchal structures and ideologies on gender-based violence beliefs and stereotypes across societies. Implications of findings for theory, practice, and research are discussed.Contribution/Originality: This study contributes in the existing literature cross-cultural knowledge about beliefs and stereotypes associated with violence against women between developed and developing countries. By demonstrating differential effects of patriarchal structures and ideologies on gender-based violence beliefs and stereotypes, the study provides fresh knowledge for future cross-cultural studies on gender-based violence.

Everyday Sadism as a Predictor of Rape Myth Acceptance and Perception of Harassment

“…In contrast, perpetrators tend to be male, and this trend becomes more evident as the severity of sexually violent crimes increases (Longpré et al, 2018). The higher endorsement of Rape Myths and worse perception of harassment observed in men support past findings from Fakunmoju and Bammeke (2017) and Cortina and Berdahl (2008) respectively. Gender was one of the best predictors of harassment and, for Rape Myths, it was even a slightly better predictor than everyday sadism.…”

Exposure to Violence and Beliefs About Violence Against Women Among Adolescents in Nigeria and South Africa

“…The findings that adolescents from Nigeria were more likely to be exposed to both IPV and family violence than adolescents from South Africa provide a unique opportunity to understand cross-national differences in experience among adolescents in the two countries, especially given the lack of comparative knowledge about these differences. Although comparative knowledge about adolescents is minimal, the finding that adolescents from Nigeria were more likely to endorse beliefs about VAW than adolescents from South Africa is consistent with previous studies that found adult respondents in Nigeria to be more likely to endorse VAW and gender stereotypes than respondents in South Africa (Fakunmoju & Bammeke, 2017;Fakunmoju et al, 2016). Altogether, these findings can be explained by some macro-level differences between the two countries as discussed below.…”

Is gender-based violence a confluence of culture? Empirical evidence from social media

“…GBV is a social ill evident across all the countries irrespective of their economy, language, and demography. However, with country, the type of GBV, its intensity, and the reaction of people vary ( Fakunmoju, Bammeke et al, 2017 ). For example, in the USA, dating violence is more common than in Africa where there are comparatively lesser instances of dating violence ( Johnson et al, 2015 ).…”