1997
DOI: 10.2307/2657423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, Children, and Social Contact: The Effects of Childrearing for Men and Women

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
131
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
131
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, they suggest that -for all network types examined here -women are more socially active and have a greater diversity of "network resources" at their disposal (see Campbell et al, 1986). Further research needs to explore whether these results indicate a larger shift in women's patterns of sociability; document a period of heightened social activity at this stage in the life course (Munch et al, 1997); or represent a different online networking behavior of women compared to their everyday offline interaction patterns.…”
Section: Comparative Results: Subgroup Differences Across Three Typesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In fact, they suggest that -for all network types examined here -women are more socially active and have a greater diversity of "network resources" at their disposal (see Campbell et al, 1986). Further research needs to explore whether these results indicate a larger shift in women's patterns of sociability; document a period of heightened social activity at this stage in the life course (Munch et al, 1997); or represent a different online networking behavior of women compared to their everyday offline interaction patterns.…”
Section: Comparative Results: Subgroup Differences Across Three Typesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Additionally, children can actively oppose their parents' dating and possible re-partnering (Koo et al 1984). It is also important to note here that though children have been shown to impact both men's and women's social networks, these effects tend to be gender specific; whereas fathers mostly temporarily increase the kin composition of their social network after the birth of a child, for women, having children results in a reduction in the size of the social network and the volume of contacts, at least until the children reach school age (Munch et al 1997). The restricted opportunities to meet and mate might be especially strong when the children restrict the labor force participation (e.g., because they are too young or there are no alternative childcare options), as work has been shown to be the most important place to meet new partners in the remarriage market (De Graaf and Kalmijn 2003).…”
Section: Why Can Children Affect Re-partnering?mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Since social (or group-based) identities are defined by their uniformity of perception and action among group members [9,73], it might be posited that boys learn to incorporate social identities earlier than do girls. If this is so, it is aligned with the idea that boys are socialized to be leaders and to be competitive while girls are socialized to be caretakers and supportive, and also with the fact that men tend to have more powerful positions within social networks than do women [28,[74][75][76].…”
Section: Gender As a "Social" Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%