2013 International Conference on Adaptive Science and Technology 2013
DOI: 10.1109/icastech.2013.6707489
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender classification using face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Facial gender is also classified based on feature dimension reduction techniques as Independent Component Analysis (ICA) with Linear Discriminant Analysis(LDA) classification [49], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with neural network classification [52], 2D-PCA with SVM classification [69] and PCA with LDA classification [11]. The best results are achieved by Independent Component Analysis (ICA) with LDA classifier on FERET dataset.…”
Section: Conventional Learning Based Facial Gender Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facial gender is also classified based on feature dimension reduction techniques as Independent Component Analysis (ICA) with Linear Discriminant Analysis(LDA) classification [49], Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with neural network classification [52], 2D-PCA with SVM classification [69] and PCA with LDA classification [11]. The best results are achieved by Independent Component Analysis (ICA) with LDA classifier on FERET dataset.…”
Section: Conventional Learning Based Facial Gender Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohamed et al [19] used DWT and DCT feature extraction techniques with the SVM classifier which outperforms with 95% accuracy on the FERET dataset compared to [18] which used DWT feature extraction with SVM classification and obtained 92% accuracy and [21] used DWT and PCA for feature extraction, fisher discriminant analysis (FDA) for classification and achieved 95% accuracy. ICA feature extraction [24] with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) classification obtained the higher accuracy of 99.3% on the FERET dataset compared [23] with 85% accuracy by using PCA feature extraction and LDA classification for gender prediction. On the one hand, Tapia and Perez [25] used various spatial scale feature fusions, which is selected using intensity, mutual information from shape, and histogram of LBP, where gender classification is performed by SVM and obtained 99.1% accuracy.…”
Section: Analysis Of Related Work For Facial Gender Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important in gender recognition because facial details carry discriminative and important information for gender classification. Many other gender recognition methods, such as [23], also use histogram equalization.…”
Section: A Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Principal Component Analysis: As previously mentioned, because of high dimensionality of image data, PCA can be used to reduce the dimensions. For instance, PCA is used in [10], [21], [22], [23] for feature extraction and reduction. Inspired by them, PCA is used for the sake of dimension reduction.…”
Section: B First Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation