2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender, coping strategies, homelessness stressors, and income generation among homeless young adults in three cities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that males were more likely to initiate drug dealing aligns with previous research on gender-based differences in drug dealing (10,45). There are several potential explanations for this observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The finding that males were more likely to initiate drug dealing aligns with previous research on gender-based differences in drug dealing (10,45). There are several potential explanations for this observation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Youth with markers of higher intensity addiction, such as binge drug use, injection drug use, and drug overdose were all more likely to engage in risky income generating activities, which aligns with recent research findings that homeless youth with a substance use disorder were more likely to engage in illegal economic activity (Ferguson, Bender, & Thompson, 2015). Reducing the intensity of these youths’ substance use may be an important opportunity to address engagement in risky income generation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Indeed, there were significant associations between self-reported executive functions, knowledge of BrainWise thinking skills, and coping self-efficacy, demonstrating the important links between these three measured domains. Our findings that coping self-efficacy improved in the BrainWise group alone represent a unique contribution to a small literature on coping in homeless adults (e.g., Ferguson et al, 2015) which generally does not focus on coping self-efficacy. Surprisingly, the results for problem solving, as measured by the WPSRS, were disappointing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%