2016
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1149596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender counts: A systematic review of evaluations of gender-integrated health interventions in low- and middle-income countries

Abstract: As a result of new global priorities, there is a growing need for high-quality evaluations of gender-integrated health programmes. This systematic review examined 99 peer-reviewed articles on evaluations of gender-integrated (accommodating and transformative) health programmes with regard to their theory of change (ToC), study design, gender integration in data collection, analysis, and gender measures used. Half of the evaluations explicitly described a ToC or conceptual framework (n = 50) that guided strateg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from reviews (Dickin et al, 2021; Muralidharan et al, 2015; Schriver et al, 2017) and studies (Bégin et al, 1999; Chintalapudi et al, 2018; Engebretsen et al, 2010; Kulkarni et al, 2020; Shroff et al, 2011) suggest that pervasive traditional household gender norms and roles can negatively impact child health, nutrition and care through inequitable household decision‐making, intra‐household food allocation and limited paternal support in the provision of resources and caregiving. However, with the exception of a few studies in Northern Malawi and rural Zambia, there is limited intervention research that has examined the impact of household gender roles on complementary feeding (Bezner Kerr, 2005, 2016; Kumar et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from reviews (Dickin et al, 2021; Muralidharan et al, 2015; Schriver et al, 2017) and studies (Bégin et al, 1999; Chintalapudi et al, 2018; Engebretsen et al, 2010; Kulkarni et al, 2020; Shroff et al, 2011) suggest that pervasive traditional household gender norms and roles can negatively impact child health, nutrition and care through inequitable household decision‐making, intra‐household food allocation and limited paternal support in the provision of resources and caregiving. However, with the exception of a few studies in Northern Malawi and rural Zambia, there is limited intervention research that has examined the impact of household gender roles on complementary feeding (Bezner Kerr, 2005, 2016; Kumar et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the records detailing interventions conducted in high-income countries (HICs) the majority detailed interventions in the USA ( n = 16), and UK ( n = 4). Three systematic reviews [ 26 28 ], and one guidance document did not systematically detail the countries of implementation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gender-aware theories were less widely cited and defined than more traditional theories of behaviour change. A key record identified in relation to the use of gender in interventions, however, was the review by Schriver and colleagues [ 28 ]. This examined the evaluation of 99 gender-aware and -transformative health promotion interventions as per the Interagency Gender Working Group definition of the Gender Equality Continuum.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This includes identifying if and how intervention studies take sex/gender into account when formulating research questions and in any underpinning theories, in study design, sample recruitment and measurement instruments, and in all aspects of the reporting of sex/gender related data. [15][16][17] Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate sex/gender considerations in a comprehensive way in intervention studies aimed at promoting PA and/or reducing SB in children and adolescents.…”
Section: Text Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%