2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
153
6
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
20
153
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sex brain dimorphism includes brain size, white and gray matter volume and regional cortical thickness changes. [34][35][36] This study did not reveal significant differences in brain size between patients with KS and controls. Moreover, sex-and testosterone-related brain differences do not seem to involve the medial orbital-frontal basal regions, thus restraining the direct role of hormonal dysfunction in determining the morphologic pattern observed in patients with KS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Sex brain dimorphism includes brain size, white and gray matter volume and regional cortical thickness changes. [34][35][36] This study did not reveal significant differences in brain size between patients with KS and controls. Moreover, sex-and testosterone-related brain differences do not seem to involve the medial orbital-frontal basal regions, thus restraining the direct role of hormonal dysfunction in determining the morphologic pattern observed in patients with KS.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…However, it still needs to be ascertained whether sex-related cortical thickness differences in BDI and BDII are of the same nature as those observed in healthy controls. [67][68][69][70][71] As commonly observed, the percentage of smokers was higher in patients than controls, 72 and smoking has been shown to have effects on cortical structure. [73][74][75][76][77] Although our results were maintained when controlling for smoking status, it cannot be excluded that smoking could have had an impact on the outcome.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Only age-and sex-matched individuals were included in this pilot study to exclude systematic confounding factors (20,21 …”
Section: Individualsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This further supports the analysis strategy we used, compared with the direct assessment of cortical thickness. Age and sex are additional potential systematic confounders (20,21); therefore, we included only age-and sexmatched groups.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%