2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1783525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences, HIV Risk Perception and Condom Use

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the right skills and knowledge, young people have a positive influence on their peers. However, this study shows that comprehensive knowledge of HIV among young people (aged [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] in Nigeria increased between 2003 and 2013 although it falls short of the global expectation for young people. Determinants of comprehensive knowledge include gender, age, and place of residence, education, household wealth index, and uptake of HIV test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…With the right skills and knowledge, young people have a positive influence on their peers. However, this study shows that comprehensive knowledge of HIV among young people (aged [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] in Nigeria increased between 2003 and 2013 although it falls short of the global expectation for young people. Determinants of comprehensive knowledge include gender, age, and place of residence, education, household wealth index, and uptake of HIV test.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A binary outcome of "1" was designated if all questions were answered correctly and "0" if any of the questions was answered incorrectly [13][14][15] . The independent variables of interest were selected based on literature 12,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] and availability in the dataset; the variables were: survey year, age, gender, education, marital status, place of residence, region of residence, household wealth index, 1 and previous uptake of HIV test.…”
Section: Study Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations