2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in burns: A study from emergency centres in the Western Cape, South Africa

Abstract: Burns were far more common among children although gender differences arose only among adults. Men sustained more injuries of somewhat different aetiology and were referred to higher levels of care more often for comparable wound severity. The results suggest different disposition between men and women despite similar AIS scores. However, further studies with more comprehensive information on severity level and other care- and patient-related factors are needed to explore these results further.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
29
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
29
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that burns are frequent in males, which agrees with some reports ( Nthumba, 2016 ; Jiang et al, 2010 ; Latifi & Karimi, 2017 ). Previously, however, the incidence of burns was found higher for males than females only in adults, with no gender difference in children ( Blom et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, another study reported burn incidence higher in females than males ( Parray et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This suggests that burns are frequent in males, which agrees with some reports ( Nthumba, 2016 ; Jiang et al, 2010 ; Latifi & Karimi, 2017 ). Previously, however, the incidence of burns was found higher for males than females only in adults, with no gender difference in children ( Blom et al, 2016 ). Furthermore, another study reported burn incidence higher in females than males ( Parray et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This supports that emphasis should be placed on males, adolescents and adults when designing the awareness programs, which contradicted the assumption of the researcher that adult females are more prone to burn type of injury. Previous literature implicated males for higher involvement in acquiring burn injury (23,29), adult males sustained a higher rate of injury in this case also. The observed numbers suggested higher male involvement though this hypothesis were rolled out when statistical analysis failed to demonstrate a difference among gender groups that are stratified by age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Typical injury cases were identified from a one-year caseload ( n = 1913) of burn patients in eight emergency centres [ 30 ] in the province. In this patient group, 39.4% were 0–4 years, 10.2% were 5–9 years and 28% were 20–39 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this patient group, 39.4% were 0–4 years, 10.2% were 5–9 years and 28% were 20–39 years. Slightly more than half were men (52.8%) and about two thirds (65.2%) were burnt by hot liquids [ 30 ]. For the purpose of this study, the dataset was first split into two age groups: children (0–12 years) and adults (13 years and older), on grounds that paediatric burns units (as other healthcare services) treat children 0–12 years while those 13 years and above are treated in adults units [ 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%