2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in cue exposure reactivity and 9-month outcome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous findings have been relatively equivocal, with regard to gender differences in drug-cue reactivity (see Introduction). However, one study using scripted vignettes comprising personal cocaine-related stimuli indicated that males were significantly more cue-reactive than females, both in relation to objective (skin conductance) and subjective (craving) arousal (Sterling et al 2004). While there were no significant gender differences in cortisol response in the current study, males were shown to be more reactive to the drug cue, compared with stress condition, and this was not seen in females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous findings have been relatively equivocal, with regard to gender differences in drug-cue reactivity (see Introduction). However, one study using scripted vignettes comprising personal cocaine-related stimuli indicated that males were significantly more cue-reactive than females, both in relation to objective (skin conductance) and subjective (craving) arousal (Sterling et al 2004). While there were no significant gender differences in cortisol response in the current study, males were shown to be more reactive to the drug cue, compared with stress condition, and this was not seen in females.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…Findings have shown women to be more cue-reactive than men (Elman et al 2001) and vice versa (Sterling et al 2004), while other studies have shown no gender variations in subjective or physiological responses to cues (Avants et al 1995;Robbins et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our findings that men were more reactive to the cue condition than females are consistent with some previous research. Sterling et al (2004) showed that males were significantly more physiologically reactive to cocaine-related cues and triggers than females, while other studies have shown no gender variation (Robbins et al, 1999;Avants et al, 1995). In this study, increased cue reactivity in males (and more specifically cocaine-abusing males) was a robust finding and is supported by neuroimaging research where males showed greater cue-induced activation of paralimbic regions associated with automatic emotional processing (Li et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…During cocaine withdrawal, the spontaneous, stressor cue-associated cocaine craving correlates with anxiety, anger, fear, and sadness [9,10], that are predictive of relapse [11]. In different studies, women were found to be more [12,13], less [14] or similarly reactive [15] to drug-associated cues during cocaine withdrawal, when compared to males. A contribution of these potential differences to sexual dimorphism in cocaine addiction remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%