2002
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2002.10399942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Dually-Diagnosed Clients Receiving Chemical Dependency Treatment

Abstract: This article considers gender differences among 97 clients with dual diagnoses of severe mental illness and chemical dependency (46 male and 51 female). Comparisons are made at the time of their admission to an inpatient chemical dependency treatment program and at follow-up in cases where data are available. Many of the findings at time of admission are consistent with the few studies that have compared men and women with co-occurring mental and substance use disorders. For example, the women were more likely… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
22
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are comparable to studies in the general population of substance-using women, which have also demonstrated high rates of comorbid depression. 47,48 However, substance-using participants in these studies typically exhibited numerous sociodemographic risk factors for depression, including single status and low socioeconomic status. Indeed, the only study to find no significant increase in rates of PPD among substance-using women was also the only study in which sociodemographic variables, such as socioeconomic status and marital status, were comparable between the substance-using and comparison groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are comparable to studies in the general population of substance-using women, which have also demonstrated high rates of comorbid depression. 47,48 However, substance-using participants in these studies typically exhibited numerous sociodemographic risk factors for depression, including single status and low socioeconomic status. Indeed, the only study to find no significant increase in rates of PPD among substance-using women was also the only study in which sociodemographic variables, such as socioeconomic status and marital status, were comparable between the substance-using and comparison groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to individuals without SUD, those with SUD report more traumatic events (Cottler, Compton, & Mager, 1992). Among those seeking treatment for SUD, 42-95% report histories of trauma (Argeriou & Daley, 1997 Brown et al, 2003;Dansky, Byrne, & Brady, 1999;Dansky, Saladin, Brady, Kilpatrick, & Resnick, 1995;DiNitto, Webb, & Rubin, 2002;Miller & Downs, 1995;Swan, Farber, & Campbell, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, gender differences exist in both of these areas; sexual and physical abuse appear more common among women in SUD treatment (DiNitto, Webb, & Rubin, 2002;Najavits, Weiss, & Shaw, 1997), whereas severe violence perpetration is more common among men (Chermack, Stoltenberg, et al, 2000). Therefore, studies examining violence perpetration and its associated characteristics among patients with SUD require sizable samples of men and women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%