2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-019-09546-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Emotional Reactions to the First 2016 Presidential Debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Political leaders seek to garner favor among voters through their words, voices, and facial expression; these "hearts and minds" appeals shape voter evaluations (Carpinella et al 2016;Everitt, Best, and Gaudet 2016;Fridkin et al 2021). Nonverbal communicationsincluding facial displays and vocal pitch-are a key mechanism by which candidates convey emotions and, in turn, influence voter assessments regarding the acceptability of candidates for leadership positions.…”
Section: Nonverbal and Emotional Communication In Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Political leaders seek to garner favor among voters through their words, voices, and facial expression; these "hearts and minds" appeals shape voter evaluations (Carpinella et al 2016;Everitt, Best, and Gaudet 2016;Fridkin et al 2021). Nonverbal communicationsincluding facial displays and vocal pitch-are a key mechanism by which candidates convey emotions and, in turn, influence voter assessments regarding the acceptability of candidates for leadership positions.…”
Section: Nonverbal and Emotional Communication In Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of debates demonstrate that voters obtain information about candidate traits and electability from on-stage exchanges, and debate performance can ultimately influence vote choice (Benoit, Hansen, and Verser 2003). Of importance for our work, scholars have shown that seeing and hearing debates shifts how people view the candidates (Druckman 2003;Fridkin et al 2021 The debate performance of candidates-and how voters react to those performances-are shaped by the gender composition of who is on stage. We are far from the first to evaluate how gender shapes the use of or response to emotions (e.g., Hess et al 2000), including in the political arena (e.g., Bauer 2015;Brooks 2011;2013;Masch and Gabriel 2020).…”
Section: Political Debates As Emotion-rich Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, our results suggest that Fiorina's anger displays tend to decrease viewer support, which is relevant to an ongoing debate on whether counterstereotypical gender behavior among political elites leads to disproportionate penalties at the ballot box (see Hitchon et al 1997, Brooks 20112013, Bauer 2017, Fridkin et al 2019, Cassese and Holman 2019. This tentative and objectively narrow result suggest that aggressive displays (or even any emotive signal more generally) by female candidates-at least among Republican contenders-might be counterproductive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Previous studies indicated that females are more likely to report fear experiences because of stereotypes that suggest it is socially undesirable for males to express fear (Brody, Lovas, & Hay, 1995). Although scholars have indicated that females are more likely to express and report their emotions, recent studies showed no gender differences in fear expression (Fridkin, Gershon, Courey, & LaPlant, 2019). Cultural differences in emotion perception are well established in the emotion-related literature (Fang, van Kleef, & Sauter, 2019).…”
Section: Fear Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%