2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: A TPB multi-group analysis at factor and indicator level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

24
174
3
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(30 reference statements)
24
174
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are similar to the revised model shows that better explains Ajzen IE (Maes et al, 2014;Valencia et al, 2015;Lanero et al, 2015;López Vidal, 2013). It is interesting to note that IE literature includes studies where SN does not appear as significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our results are similar to the revised model shows that better explains Ajzen IE (Maes et al, 2014;Valencia et al, 2015;Lanero et al, 2015;López Vidal, 2013). It is interesting to note that IE literature includes studies where SN does not appear as significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…There is a growing interest in research focused in women entrepreneurship (Wilson et al, 2007;BarNir, Watson & Hutchins, 2011;Karimi et al, 2013;Mueller & Conway, 2013;Maes et al, 2014). Liñán & Fayolle (2015) found that 30 of 409 papers published between 2004 and 2013 (inclusive) linked with EI were related with gender issues.…”
Section: Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various studies have shown that women choose to become entrepreneurs less often because they usually perceive a smaller locus of internal control and smaller self-efficacy (Maes, Leroy, & Sels, 2014). In the same way, some studies have found that women are more prone to attribute their success to the external locus rather than to their own ability or effort (Verheul, Thurik, Grilo, & Zwan, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%