2003
DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Expatriate Job Performance

Abstract: Cette étude s'était donné pour but l'analyse des différences de genre dans les performances professionnelles à l'etranger. Ce faisant, on cherchait à répondre à deux grandes questions: 1. Les femmes peuvent-elles remplir efficacement les fonctions d'un emploi à l'étranger? 2. Les expatriées peuvent-elles réussir dans un environnement culturel susceptible d'être perçu peu accueillant aux femmes selon les normes occidentáles? L'échantillon était constitué de 193 expatriés, provenant de 36 pays, qui travaillaient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
54
4
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
54
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Job performance is a multidimensional construct consisting of task dimension and contextual dimension (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993). A review of literature indicated individual differences such as gender (Caligiuri & Tung, 1999;Sinangil & Ones, 2003), Big Five Personality (e.g., Dalton & Wilson, 2000;Caligiuri, 2000;Mol et al, 2005), self-monitoring personality (Caligiuri & Day, 2000), goal orientation (Wang & Takeuchi, 2007), task and people orientation (Shaffer et al, 2006), cultural flexibility (Shaffer et al, 2006), non-ethnocentrism (Hechanova et al, 2003), communicational ability, relational ability, stress tolerance (Holopainen & Bjorkman, 2005), and previous international experience (Varma, Toh, & Budhwar, 2006) related to expatriate job performance.…”
Section: Employee Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job performance is a multidimensional construct consisting of task dimension and contextual dimension (Borman & Motowidlo, 1993). A review of literature indicated individual differences such as gender (Caligiuri & Tung, 1999;Sinangil & Ones, 2003), Big Five Personality (e.g., Dalton & Wilson, 2000;Caligiuri, 2000;Mol et al, 2005), self-monitoring personality (Caligiuri & Day, 2000), goal orientation (Wang & Takeuchi, 2007), task and people orientation (Shaffer et al, 2006), cultural flexibility (Shaffer et al, 2006), non-ethnocentrism (Hechanova et al, 2003), communicational ability, relational ability, stress tolerance (Holopainen & Bjorkman, 2005), and previous international experience (Varma, Toh, & Budhwar, 2006) related to expatriate job performance.…”
Section: Employee Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of literature indicated individual differences such as self-monitoring personality (Caligiuri & Day, 2000), gender (Sinangil & Ones, 2003), non-ethnocentrism (Hechanova et al, 2003, Big Five Personality (Mol et al, 2005), communicational ability, relational ability, stress tolerance (Holopainen & Bjorkman, 2005), cultural flexibility (Shaffer et al, 2006), task and people orientation (Shaffer et al, 2006), goal orientation (Wang & Takeuchi, 2007) and previous international experience (Varma et al, 2006) related to expatriate job performance.…”
Section: Job Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective management of individual performance is critical to the execution of strategy and the organization achieving its strategic objectives (Amos, et al, 2004). A review of literature indicated individual differences such as self-monitoring personality (Caligiuri & Day, 2000), gender (Sinangil & Ones, 2003 Hence, after a thorough review of the different concepts of performance, it can be argued that performance in its simplest form is the desired result which the organization seeks to achieve efficiently and effectively.…”
Section: Job Performancementioning
confidence: 99%