2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in learning preferences among participants of serious business games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gender is not a significant factor, in this particular finding the research results are consistent, and it thus strengthens the validity of Martín-García (2003) research. However, a discrepancy can be found with the research (Garber et al, 2017), which was focused on factors affecting the learning styles when using a marketing game. After playing it, the learning styles that students preferred were analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gender is not a significant factor, in this particular finding the research results are consistent, and it thus strengthens the validity of Martín-García (2003) research. However, a discrepancy can be found with the research (Garber et al, 2017), which was focused on factors affecting the learning styles when using a marketing game. After playing it, the learning styles that students preferred were analysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are many studies (e.g. Allen et al, 2013;Espinoza-Poves et al, 2019;Garber et al, 2017;Holtbrügge & Mohr, 2010;Karns, 2006) studying variables affecting learning styles. The gender of students is a common factor in research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…McGraw-Hill Education [53]; Rogowski et al [54]; Vagg et al [55]; Severiens and Ten Dam [56]; Keri [57]; Francis [58]; Alkhasawneh et al [59]; Demirbas and Demirkan [60]; Sarabi-Asiabar et al [61]; Al-Saud [62]; Cetin and Erel [63]; Dalmolin et al [64]; Othman et al [65]; Demirkan [66]; Matthews [67]; Garber [68]; Yousef [69]; Gappi [70]; Kolb [71]; Felder and Soloman [72].…”
Section: Studies On Online Learning and Knowledge-based Educational Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent literature on addressing business students' learning preferences is scarce. Garber et al discuss "the gender differences in learning style revealed by attitudinal response to participation in serious business games" [68] and conclude that "female partic-ipants show themselves to be concrete experiencers (CE), viewing themselves as learners who are accepting, feeling and receptive graspers of experience, while male participants are abstract conceptualizers (AC), viewing themselves as learners who are logical, analytical and present-oriented graspers of experience" [68]. There is no relevant difference in learning style preferences by gender among statistics students according to Youssef [69] and Gappi [70] when measuring the specific four dimensions defined by Kolb [71] and Felder and Soloman [72]: active/reflective, sensing/intuitive, visual/verbal and sequential/global.…”
Section: Studies On Digitally Driven Student Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%