2014
DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2014.916092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in mathematics and science: the role of the actiotope in determining individuals’ achievements and confidence in their own abilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This view is supported by [29] and [6] who asserted that there is no significant statistical difference between the performance of male and female students in mathematics worldwide. Yet, gender differences in mathematics and science continues to exist in some countries [30]. Cases where female dominate their male counterparts in terms of performance in mathematics are rare.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Geometry Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is supported by [29] and [6] who asserted that there is no significant statistical difference between the performance of male and female students in mathematics worldwide. Yet, gender differences in mathematics and science continues to exist in some countries [30]. Cases where female dominate their male counterparts in terms of performance in mathematics are rare.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Geometry Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can differ from society to society or from culture to culture and can be changed. Gender differences in math achievement continues to exist in some countries, including the United States, (Ziegler et al, 2014) and these differences continue to capture the interest of many stakeholders, including educators and policymakers (Reilly, Neumann, & Andrews, 2015). According to research conducted by Cheema and Galluzzo, there is evidence to support a small, yet significant gender achievement gap in mathematics (2013).…”
Section: Gender and Math Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All 248 participants completed the same materials, which comprised some personal data, the Questionnaire of Educational and Learning Capital (see materials of Study 1) and the Actiotope Questionnaire (Ziegler, 2008;Ziegler, Stoeger, Harder, Park, Portešová, & Porath, 2014).…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actiotope Questionnaire. Students' actiotopes were assessed with the components and dynamic function subscales of the Actiotope Questionnaire (Ziegler, 2008;Ziegler et al, 2014). This questionnaire provides information on the extent to which students have successfully integrated academic learning in their actiotope.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%