Gender Differences in Modifying Lumbopelvic Motion during Hip Medial Rotation in People with Low Back Pain

Hoffman, Shannon L.; Johnson, Molly; Zou, Dequan; Dillen, Linda R. Van

doi:10.1155/2012/635312

Cited by 21 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The without LBP [59][60][61]. Nevertheless, it was suggested that gender differences may not be relevant when subgrouping subjects by different patterns of lumbar posture and movements [62].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time-course and factors affecting movement control in acute low back pain: A prospective cohort study in a primary care setting

Hofstetter

Pfeiffer

Meichtry³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A subgroup of low back pain (LBP) patients present with movement control impairment (MCI). Although there has been extensive research in this area, there is a lack of knowledge of how movement control develops over time and the factors that impact MCI after an acute LBP-episode. Objective : The investigation followed the time-course of MCI in the first three months after an onset of acute LBP-episode, including a baseline-effect evaluation of various demographic, physical and psychosocial characteristics on MCI. Methods : Within this prospective cohort study, 68 subjects with an acute onset of LBP of less than four weeks duration were recruited. In conclusion, 56 subjects were assessed three times at four, eight and twelve weeks. Questionnaire data was collected using an online survey, including demographic data, pain intensity, recurrence of LBP, disability, depression, pain-related activity patterns, activity level and the use of physiotherapy treatment. In addition, a physical examination was performed at the same time points (TP) to assess MCI. For the data analysis, we performed a regression analysis, using proportional odds models. Results : The majority of the participants presented with MCI during the measurement period, although with highly individual courses. The evaluation of baseline and time effects for disability, pain-related activity patterns and physical treatment confirmed interactions with MCI. In contrast, pain intensity and recurrent episodes of LBP revealed effects on MCI only in the adjusted model in combination with other variables. Conclusions : MCI plays a significant role in a subgroup of subjects in the course of LBP after an acute onset of symptoms. Physiotherapy treatment showed short time effects on MCI and might be essential in stratified care in a primary care setting. Further longitudinal studies are needed to assess the association of those different physical and psychosocial characteristics of MCI to calculate their time-interaction on MCI. This is due to the multidimensional nature of LBP and the underlying mechanisms of MCI still being unidentified.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Time-course and factors affecting movement control in acute low back pain: A prospective cohort study in a primary care setting

Hofstetter

Pfeiffer

Meichtry³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…No earlier study has investigated whether middleaged men have less ability to control flexion movements in the trunk than do women. A study examining the effect of sex on the ability of adults with LBP to reduce lumbo-pelvic motion, however, showed that men demonstrated greater lumbo-pelvic rotation and less hip rotation during lumbopelvic rotation than did women, 31 indicating that there are Bold numbers indicate a significant (P < 0.05) difference between men and women. …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Physical Activity Might Be of Greater Importance for Good Spinal Control Than If You Have Had Pain or Not

Aasa

Lundell

Aasa

et al. 2015

SPINE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 and 2). 27,28 The collected data were filtered with Butterworth low pass filter with cut off frequency of 2 Hz. The initial and terminal point of motion for pelvic and lower extremity segments were determined based on previous study.…”

Section: Kinematic Measurement and Processingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Kinematic Differences in Lumbopelvic and Hip Movement Patterns During a Lower Limb Movement Test Between Two Groups of People With Low Back Pain

Sadeghisani

Shaterzadeh

Karimi

et al. 2017

J. Mech. Med. Biol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Increased lumbopelvic motion during limb movements' tests was reported in low back pain (LBP) patients with and without rotational demand activities. The aim of this study was to compare lumbopelvic movement pattern between two groups of LBP patients with and without rotational demand activity during active hip external rotation test. Thirty nine patients with non-specific chronic LBP participated in this study. Patients were allocated into two groups, in first group 15 subjects (mean age ¼ 31:5 years) with rotational demand activities such as tennis, squash and golf, and in second group 24 subjects (mean age ¼ 31:2) without rotational demand activities participated in current study. Kinematic data from lumbopelvic-hip region during active hip external rotation test (AHER) were collected by a 3D motion analysis system. Variables including range of motion (ROM) of hip external rotation, pelvic rotation, pelvic rotation during first half of hip rotation motion and timing of pelvic-hip movement were calculated by MATLAB software for both sides and after this, independent t-test was used to compare the variables between 2 groups of study. The mean lumbopelvic rotation in lower extremities tests for both sides and lumbopelvic rotation in the dominant limb external J. Mech. Med. Biol. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND on 06/21/16. For personal use only. rotation test in the patients with rotational demand activities were significantly more than other group (p < 0:05). During dominant lower limb movement test, pelvic rotation in first half of movement and in patients with rotational activities was greater than in non-rotational group but hip rotation was statistically lesser than other group (p < 0:05). Other variables between the two groups were not significantly different (p > 0:05). The result of the study suggest that LBP patients who have rotational demand sports activities may move their lumbopelvic region in a greater magnitude during the AHER test than LBP people without rotational demand activities. Therefore, Lumbopelvic movement pattern in the different groups of the patients with LBP and based on their specific activities is different with each other.

show abstract

Gender Differences in Modifying Lumbopelvic Motion during Hip Medial Rotation in People with Low Back Pain

Cited by 21 publications

References 43 publications

Time-course and factors affecting movement control in acute low back pain: A prospective cohort study in a primary care setting

Time-course and factors affecting movement control in acute low back pain: A prospective cohort study in a primary care setting

Physical Activity Might Be of Greater Importance for Good Spinal Control Than If You Have Had Pain or Not

Kinematic Differences in Lumbopelvic and Hip Movement Patterns During a Lower Limb Movement Test Between Two Groups of People With Low Back Pain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About