1991
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity.

Abstract: Affect intensity (AI) may reconcile 2 seemingly paradoxical findings: Women report more negative affect than men but equal happiness as men. AI describes people's varying response intensity to identical emotional stimuli. A college sample of 66 women and 34 men was assessed on both positive and negative affect using 4 measurement methods: self-report, peer report, daily report, and memory performance. A principal-components analysis revealed an affect balance component and an AI component. Multimeasure affect … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
385
7
34

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 689 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
40
385
7
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Many neuroimaging studies that report dACC activation during emotional tasks included only women in an attempt to minimize heterogeneity of response to emotional stimuli (for examples, see Hutcherson et al, 2005;Ochsner et al, 2002). The justification for the inclusion of women rather than men is that women report experiencing greater emotional intensity than men (Diener et al, 1985;Fujita et al, 1991;Grossman and Wood, 1993) and are more physiologically aroused in response to emotional stimuli, even when self-reported emotion differences are not found (Grossman and Wood, 1993). Consistent with these previous observations, we observed that dACC activation during the processing of high arousal pictures is significantly greater in women than in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many neuroimaging studies that report dACC activation during emotional tasks included only women in an attempt to minimize heterogeneity of response to emotional stimuli (for examples, see Hutcherson et al, 2005;Ochsner et al, 2002). The justification for the inclusion of women rather than men is that women report experiencing greater emotional intensity than men (Diener et al, 1985;Fujita et al, 1991;Grossman and Wood, 1993) and are more physiologically aroused in response to emotional stimuli, even when self-reported emotion differences are not found (Grossman and Wood, 1993). Consistent with these previous observations, we observed that dACC activation during the processing of high arousal pictures is significantly greater in women than in men.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É comum relacionar fatores de bem-estar psicológico e subjetivo com variáveis demográficas, a exemplo do gêne-ro (Caetano & Estrada, 2006;Chaves et al, 2002;Fujita et al, 1991;Hutchinson et al, 2004;Peiró, 2006) e da idade (Otta & Fiquer, 2004;Ryff, 1989;Santavirta et al, 2005). Embora existam mais evidências a favor de maior bemestar por parte de participantes do sexo masculino e mais velhos, como previamente ficou assinalado, isso não se constatou no presente estudo.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…De modo semelhante, Hutchinson et al (2004) constataram que as mulheres apresentam níveis mais baixos de bem-estar psicológico e satisfação com a vida do que os homens. Pode-se observar nas mulheres maior presença de estados de depressão, ansiedade e mais afetos negativos (Fujita, Diener, & Sandvik, 1991), embora estas demonstrem nível de felicidade igual ou inclusive superior ao dos homens. Peiró (2006) ressalta que em alguns países (por exemplo, Austrália, China, Finlândia, Japão, Nigéria e Sudão) as mulheres declararam um grau maior de felicidade geral do que o fizeram os homens.…”
Section: Bem-estar Subjetivo E Variáveis Demográficasunclassified
“…Only women were included because of evidence that emotions are typically more intense and more prone to regulation in women (e.g., Fujita, Diener, & Sandvik, 1991), but also to increase comparability with previous emotion regulation studies that also included women only (Kim & Hamann, 2007) and to avoid any potential sex differences that could have modulated the regulation effects of interest. We did not record information about their menstrual cycle (see Limitations).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%