2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5332-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in occupational exposure to carcinogens among Italian workers

Abstract: BackgroundMany carcinogenic chemicals are still used or produced in several economic sectors. The aim of this study is to investigate differences in occupational exposure patterns to carcinogens by gender in Italy.MethodsInformation about the most common carcinogens recorded in the Italian occupational exposures database (SIREP) for the period 1996–2015 was retrieved. Descriptive statistics were calculated for exposure-related variables (carcinogenic agent, occupational group, economic activity sector, and wor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Potential differences in occupational exposures between women and men may explain some of the differences in symptom experience by gender. Occupational segregation or gender differences in employment conditions, job titles, or work assignments have been documented in occupational health literature 27,40,41 . Indeed, our study observed some differences in work activities between female and male cleaning workers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Potential differences in occupational exposures between women and men may explain some of the differences in symptom experience by gender. Occupational segregation or gender differences in employment conditions, job titles, or work assignments have been documented in occupational health literature 27,40,41 . Indeed, our study observed some differences in work activities between female and male cleaning workers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…"Model 1" analysis discovered the ORs among all IndSIC sections using "housewife" as "Reference 1" and Section S (Other services as member of organization, repair of household) as "Reference 2". Housewives, the "Reference 1", were considered to have the most similar tasks in all settings, less probability of contact to workplace exposures, the majority of them being non-smokers, and them being at a lower risk of lung cancer compared to other occupations [24][25][26][27][28]. The limitation of this reference group is that they were not part of IndSIC and that they were all females.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them are associated with increased cancer risk upon exposure to PAH and other xenobiotics (Gajecka et al 2005;Olshan et al 2000). In addition, investigation of the gender effect is important since it is known most of the jobs associated with high PAH exposure are mostly made by men (Scarselli et al 2018). Table 1: Viability determined by a MTT assay in skin explants and primary cultures of normal human keratinocytes exposed to SSL (2 MED), CTP and CTP-S (CTP: crude coal tar pitch extract; CTP-S: synthetic reconstitution of the PAH fraction of CTP) following different experimental protocols.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%