1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00350.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in Pattern Reversal Evoked Potentials in Normal Elderly

Abstract: Pattern reversal evoked potentials (PREPs) were recorded in 51 normal elderly subjects (27 males. 24 females). Elderly females had shorter P100 and N150 latencies, greater P100‐N150 amplitudes, and higher noise power than elderly males. The N150 latency differences were significant even when P100 latency effects were partialled out statistically. Gender differences in P100‐N150 amplitude Mere independent of both noise power and PREP latency measures. These results provide evidence that, in the elderly, 1) gend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The N150 latency differences were significant even when P 100 latency effect were partially out statistically. The result provide evidences that in the elderly gender differences in PREP amplitude reflects factor specific to CNS processing of visual stimuli rater than global CNS anatomical or physiological factors and that gender differences in P 100 latency reported in younger group were also present in the elderly [17].…”
Section: Vep In Elderly Populationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The N150 latency differences were significant even when P 100 latency effect were partially out statistically. The result provide evidences that in the elderly gender differences in PREP amplitude reflects factor specific to CNS processing of visual stimuli rater than global CNS anatomical or physiological factors and that gender differences in P 100 latency reported in younger group were also present in the elderly [17].…”
Section: Vep In Elderly Populationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Gender has been shown to influence a variety of electrophysiological measures. It has been widely reported that adult women have larger brainstem and cortical evoked responses (e.g., Beaumont and Mayes, 1977;Buchsbaum et al 1974;Fein and Brown 1987;Halliday 1982;Michalewski et al 1980;Shagass et al 1972;Shearer et al 1992) and shorter EP latencies than men (e.g., Allison et al 1983;Fein and Brown 1987;Ikuta and Furuta 1982;Shagass et al 1972;Stockard et al 1979;Taylor et al 1990;Trune et al 1988). However, the factors that mediate electrophysiological differences between men and women are not well understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were performed in the neurophysiology labora tory (Fein and Brown, 1987) under a PS protocol identical to that used in the magnet. Midline electrodes were placed over the occipital lobe (Oz) referenced to the fron tal lobe (Fz).…”
Section: Evoked Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%