Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers

Demailly, Zoe; Brulard, Geoffroy; Selim, Jean; Compère, Vincent; Besnier, Emmanuel; Clavier, Thomas

doi:10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.030

Cited by 22 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…found that the visibility of women remains lower than that of men, particularly on social networks dedicated to science research (e.g., Research Gate). [ 6 ]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Striding towards the pinnacles of professional growth, scientific epitome, and leadership: India's women anaesthesiologists

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…found that the visibility of women remains lower than that of men, particularly on social networks dedicated to science research (e.g., Research Gate). [ 6 ]…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Striding towards the pinnacles of professional growth, scientific epitome, and leadership: India's women anaesthesiologists

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Women received lower scientific reputation scores on research social networks (i.e. ResearchGate) compared with men and were significantly less ‘followed’ despite having similar skills and citations [38].…”

Section: Barriers To Women In Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Current status and solutions for gender equity in anaesthesia research

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Despite increasing numbers of women entering anaesthesia, they remain persistently under‐represented within academic anaesthesia and research. Gender discordance is seen across multiple aspects of research, including authorship, editorship, peer review, grant receipt, speaking and leading. Women are also under‐represented at higher faculty ranks and in department chair positions. These inequities are further magnified for women with intersectional identities, such as those who identify as Black, indigenous and women of colour. Several barriers to participation in research have been identified to date, including a disproportionate amount of family responsibilities, a disproportionate burden of clinical service, gender bias, sexual harassment and the gender pay gap. Several strategies to improve gender equity have been proposed. Increasing access to formal mentorship of women in academic medicine is frequently cited and has been used by healthcare institutions and medical societies. Senior faculty and leaders must also be conscious of including women in sponsorship and networking opportunities. Institutions should provide support for parents of all genders, including supportive parental leave policies and flexible work models. Women should also be materially supported to attend formal educational conferences targeted for women, aimed at improving networking, peer support and professional development. Finally, leaders must display a clear intolerance for sexual harassment and discrimination to drive culture change. Peers and leaders alike, of all genders, can act as upstanders and speak up on behalf of targets of discrimination, both in the moment or after the fact. Gender inequities have persisted for far too long and can no longer be ignored. Diversifying the anaesthesia research community is essential to the future of the field.

show abstract

“…A social network presence metric that jointly integrates both networks has not been found in the academic literature. All of the authors use as metrics those thrown by each social network [88]. In the case of LinkedIn, presence is measured through the existence of an account, the number of contacts, and the existence of a photo.…”

Section: Model Variablesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Networks and Open Innovation: Business Academic Productivity

Sánchez‐Teba

Rodríguez‐Fernández

Gaspar‐González

2021

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Is there any type of relationship between the academic productivity of business researchers and their social networking activity? What does this mean in terms of open innovation? With these objectives, in this paper we have focused on the Technology Acceptance Model and the concept of performativity, filling the gap that exists in the current scientific literature. At the empirical level, we carried out a review of 211 articles from the Web of Science (SSCI), obtaining a total set of 12,939 data points. Our statistical model has showed a clear symbiotic relationship between productivity in Google Scholar and presence in ResearchGate. Furthermore, researchers with a greater presence on LinkedIn or Twitter have low Google Scholar or Web of Science h-indices. We concluded that there is currently a dissociation between academic and professional online networks, something that does not help the applicability of research in business and society, the enduring aim of any search for knowledge. Information Science can play an important role in helping to bridge the gap between academia and the real world. Furthermore, in order to contribute to enhancing the role of universities in open innovation practices, it is essential to design and implement new tools such as online communities that stimulate interaction and facilitate network effects.

show abstract

Gender differences in professional social media use among anaesthesia researchers

Cited by 22 publications

References 13 publications

Striding towards the pinnacles of professional growth, scientific epitome, and leadership: India's women anaesthesiologists

Striding towards the pinnacles of professional growth, scientific epitome, and leadership: India's women anaesthesiologists

Current status and solutions for gender equity in anaesthesia research

Social Networks and Open Innovation: Business Academic Productivity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About