2006
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000189318.80061.fe
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in the Fatigability of the Inspiratory Muscles

Abstract: The results provide some evidence that the fatigability of the inspiratory muscles is different between genders. Females demonstrated a slower rate of fatigue during resistive breathing than males, a finding independent of muscle strength.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, sex differences in sympathetic vasomotor outflow in the present study might be attributable to less metabolic accumulation within the respiratory muscles in women. In line with this, women also exhibit greater inspiratory muscle fatigue resistance than men (Gonzales & Scheuermann, ; Guenette et al., ). Sex differences in muscle morphology and substrate utilization are likely to contribute to the attenuated metabolite accumulation and greater inspiratory muscle fatigue resistance reported in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore, sex differences in sympathetic vasomotor outflow in the present study might be attributable to less metabolic accumulation within the respiratory muscles in women. In line with this, women also exhibit greater inspiratory muscle fatigue resistance than men (Gonzales & Scheuermann, ; Guenette et al., ). Sex differences in muscle morphology and substrate utilization are likely to contribute to the attenuated metabolite accumulation and greater inspiratory muscle fatigue resistance reported in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Only two previous studies have compared inspiratory muscle endurance time between men and women. Using flow‐resistive loads (70% MIP, 18 breaths min −1 , 0.5 duty cycle; calculated TTI = 0.35), Gonzales and Scheuermann () found no significant sex‐based difference in time to task failure despite women on average lasting 13% longer (M, 12.3 min; W, 14.1 min). Similarly, Shimizu et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of sex‐related differences in fatigability during sustained and intermittent volitional contractions under ischaemic conditions (Russ & Kent‐Braun, 2003; Clark et al 2005), where blood flow is no longer a factor, and the observation that during sustained contractions the time to fatigue is a function of absolute force (Hunter & Enoka, 2001; Hunter et al 2006 b ) support this view. In contrast, the increased fatigability in men during intermittent submaximal isometric contractions is not dependent on maximal strength (Hunter et al 2004 b ; Gonzales & Scheuermann, 2006) and even when matched for absolute strength, men were more fatigable than women during both intermittent and sustained contractions (Fulco et al 1999; Hunter et al 2004 b ; Gonzales & Scheuermann, 2006). Consequently, there remains uncertainty as to whether differences in blood flow to the working muscles can explain the differences in fatigability of men and women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%