1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01175354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender differences in the interpersonal response to depression and spinal cord injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the partner eventually develops his or her own depressive symptoms, hostile feelings, ambivalent support, and withdrawal from the depressed person 10, 12. Three decades of research have supported the idea of this interpersonal systemic response to depressive symptoms in couples 13–18. Several of these studies have examined the interactional model for depression in adults with heart disease 13, 14 as well as spinal cord injury 15–18 and found support for components of the model in medically ill populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the partner eventually develops his or her own depressive symptoms, hostile feelings, ambivalent support, and withdrawal from the depressed person 10, 12. Three decades of research have supported the idea of this interpersonal systemic response to depressive symptoms in couples 13–18. Several of these studies have examined the interactional model for depression in adults with heart disease 13, 14 as well as spinal cord injury 15–18 and found support for components of the model in medically ill populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of disconfirming studies underscores the possibility that the depression-rejection relation may be affected by moderator variables that interact with depression to induce rejection. 1 In this regard, Hammen and Peters (1977) found that written descriptions of depressed persons elicited more rejection than did written descriptions of nondepressed subjects, particularly if the transcript described a depressed male subject (see also Boswell & Murray, 1981;Hammen & Peters, 1978;Phillips, 1964;Yamamoto & Dinzey, 1967; but see Borden & Baum, 1987;Frank et al, 1987;Gotlib & Beatty, 1985;Stephens, Hokanson, & Welker, 1987;Winer, Bonner, Blaney, & Murray, 1981, for studies in which gender effects were not found).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, these reactions may inadvertently reinforce the problematic depressive behavior. Accumulating research indicates that persons with physical disability who display depressive behaviors are also rejected and devalued, and are held accountable for their behavior Frank et al, 1986). The current study indicates that negative verbal, nonverbal, and cognitive reactions are detectable in short-term interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These characterizations may not reflect the presentation of depressive symptomatology in routine encounters. Additionally, the use of male actors precludes conclusive extrapolations to women with disability, although analogue research has not detected any meaningful differences in the reactions to depressed men and women with disability (Frank et al, 1987). The contrived interactions limit generalizability of the findings to ongoing interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation