Gender differences in the manifestation of burden among family caregivers of people with mental disorders

Abstract

This is a cross‐sectional study conducted with 537 family caregivers of people with mental disorders. The objective was to quantify the degree of burden experienced by men and women, and identify the most affected dimensions of their lives and the factors associated with burden manifestation by gender. The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) scale was used to assess burden. Mean burden was 22.8 points (SD = 6.3) for men and 27.8 points (SD = 17.8) for women. The most affected dimensions among the two groups were the same; however, among the 22 items on the scale, 11 presented significantly higher means among women. The factors associated with the manifestation of burden in both groups were as follows: low income; use of psychotropic drugs; greater degree of dependence of the service user; not receiving family support; and dissatisfaction with family relationships. For men, manifestation of burden was also associated with age. For women, there were further associations of the outcome with the presence of health problems, not having someone to share care with, and caring for the assisted person for >10 years. Our findings suggest that the degree of burden of family members caring for those with mental disorders is associated with gender, and this should be considered by services responsible for planning care shared by professionals and relatives. Guidelines for Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE Statement) were adhered to in this study.

The quality of life of regional and remote cancer caregivers in Australia

“…This was not evident in the current findings; however, higher levels of burden were more strongly associated with poorer outcomes on depression, anxiety, stress and physical QoL for male caregivers when compared with female caregivers. This is consistent with other research suggesting that caregiver burden tends to manifest differently between male and female caregivers (Treichel et al, 2020). The increased impact of burden on outcomes for male caregivers evident here may reflect typically masculine traits that decrease one's ability to effectively deal with or reduce burden.…”

Walking Alongside: Views of Family Members on Medical Assistance in Dying for Mental Illness as the Sole Underlying Medical Condition

“…This study also exemplifies steps and methods that facilitate the inclusion of family members in discussions about MAiD MI-SUMC, which is paramount in future debates on this very topic. However, this study has some limitations related to demographic and ethnic diversity, with women accounting for the vast proportion of participants; this is nonetheless consistent with the literature on caregiving for persons living with mental illness, where women frequently constitute a sizable majority and also experience higher levels of burden (Treichel et al, 2020). Given these disparities, future research should hear the voices of Indigenous and racialized women-intersected with a wider range of social determinants of health-along with other communities, such as LGBT2SQ+ persons, caregiving men, and families of persons with addictions.…”

Predictors of Caregiver Burden Among Carers of Suicide Attempt Survivors

“…These findings are consistent with previous research on carers of people with mental illness ( Hielscher et al, 2019 ) that the impact of caregiving, feeling close to the person, and a perceived inability to avert the attempt given a high frequency of contact with the person led to the experience of high caregiver burden. Combining findings with previous literature highlights that females are more likely to take on caring roles compared with males ( Diminic et al, 2019 ), where a doubling or more of working hours impacts on the mental health of female carers ( Treichel et al, 2020 ). This may be in conjunction with less choice about the role, making the caregiver experience more impactful ( O'Connor & Forgan, 2007 ).…”