2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10936-007-9055-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gender Differences in the Media Interviews of Bill and Hillary Clinton

Abstract: Does gender make a difference in the way politicians speak and are spoken to in public? This paper examines perspective in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Bill Clinton in June 2004 and in three television interviews and two radio interviews with Hillary Clinton in June 2003 with the same interviewers. Our perspectival approach assumes that each utterance has a dialogically constructed point of view. Earlier research has shown that markers of conceptual orality and literacy as well as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this male model is arguably no longer acceptable for female political candidates, and a tradeoff exists between likeability and competence (Rudman and Fairchild 2004): If they are too masculine (Hillary Clinton), they are perceived as able but are disliked, whereas if they are too feminine (Sarah Palin), they are liked but are viewed as incompetent (McGinley 2009;Suleiman and O'Connell 2007). Female candidates receive more votes in simulated elections only when they are evaluated higher on both stereotypical ''masculine'' and ''feminine'' characteristics, whereas male candidates seem to enjoy more flexibility (Bystrom 2004;Cheung and Helpern 2010;Hall 2004;Lawless 2009).…”
Section: The Corpus Of Televised Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this male model is arguably no longer acceptable for female political candidates, and a tradeoff exists between likeability and competence (Rudman and Fairchild 2004): If they are too masculine (Hillary Clinton), they are perceived as able but are disliked, whereas if they are too feminine (Sarah Palin), they are liked but are viewed as incompetent (McGinley 2009;Suleiman and O'Connell 2007). Female candidates receive more votes in simulated elections only when they are evaluated higher on both stereotypical ''masculine'' and ''feminine'' characteristics, whereas male candidates seem to enjoy more flexibility (Bystrom 2004;Cheung and Helpern 2010;Hall 2004;Lawless 2009).…”
Section: The Corpus Of Televised Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the we and they mentality prevailed -good guys and bad guys. Finally, notable differences in the way in which Hillary and Bill Clinton referred to their interviewers in their media interviews (Suleiman & O'Connell, 2008) have been found. Hillary Clinton addressed all five of her interviewers (male and female alike) with their first name, whereas Bill Clinton addressed none of his interviewers in this manner.…”
Section: Some Recent Research On Referringmentioning
confidence: 98%